https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118
Nicolas Chauvet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Blocks|4
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118
Sérgio Basto changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118
Sérgio Basto changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118
leigh scott changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||leigh123li...@gmail.com
Flags
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118
--- Comment #76 from Sérgio Basto 2016-08-25 22:45:38 CEST
---
https://cinelerra-cv.org/
August 6, 2016
Good Guy has constantly improved Cinelerra 5.1
I think I could try version 5.1 which support HD videos etc.
--
Configure bugmail: https
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118
--- Comment #75 from Bill McGonigle
2016-05-31 22:39:58 CEST ---
> What you mean by "Rebuilt via rpmbuild from 20160529 / 0841ef5 " ?
I built it successfully using rpmbuild (which failed on me last time due to the
XML::Parser problem). It was
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118
--- Comment #74 from Sérgio Basto 2016-05-29 22:46:11 CEST
---
(In reply to comment #73)
> > checking for XML::Parser... configure: error: XML::Parser perl module is
> > required for intltool
>
> I tracked this down to an ancient version of XML
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118
--- Comment #73 from Bill McGonigle
2016-05-29 20:07:15 CEST ---
> checking for XML::Parser... configure: error: XML::Parser perl module is
> required for intltool
I tracked this down to an ancient version of XML::Parser hiding in /usr/local.
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118
--- Comment #72 from Sérgio Basto 2016-05-04 19:00:24 CEST
---
mock -r fedora-23-x86_64-rpmfusion_nonfree --no-clean --rebuild
./cinelerra-cv-2.3-9.20160216git5aa9bc2.fc23.src.rpm
works for me ,
But just in case I update SOURCES dir inclusi
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118
Bill McGonigle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bill-bugzilla.rpmfusion.org
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|3 |4
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzil
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118
--- Comment #70 from Antonio Trande 2016-02-21 17:42:49
CET ---
Okay, I think we can close this review; just a note, I seen that video files
cannot be imported in Cinelerra because an error like
> virtual int
> FileMOV::read_frame(VFrame*):qui
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118
--- Comment #69 from Kevin Kofler 2016-02-21 14:43:59
CET ---
It's almost certainly the -Wl,--as-needed line:
> sed -i -e 's! -shared ! -Wl,--as-needed\0!g' libtool
which is causing the issue. (IMHO, it's a linker bug, because the symbols are
ac
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118
--- Comment #68 from Sérgio Basto 2016-02-19 03:42:59 CET
---
(In reply to comment #67)
> (In reply to comment #66)
> > (In reply to comment #64)
> >
> > > Build and install the package, then
> > >
> > > ldd -r /usr/lib64/cinelerra-cv/dissolve
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118
--- Comment #67 from Antonio Trande 2016-02-18 16:17:26
CET ---
(In reply to comment #66)
> (In reply to comment #64)
>
> > Build and install the package, then
> >
> > ldd -r /usr/lib64/cinelerra-cv/dissolve.so
>
> Based on Rex Dieter opinion
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118
--- Comment #66 from Sérgio Basto 2016-02-18 14:57:15 CET
---
(In reply to comment #64)
> Build and install the package, then
>
> ldd -r /usr/lib64/cinelerra-cv/dissolve.so
Based on Rex Dieter opinion, it's ok for plugins ...
> Do you want i
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118
--- Comment #65 from Antonio Trande 2016-02-18 11:06:49
CET ---
Just another thing:
I think it's better to use "BuildRequires: pkgconfig(foo)" form; libGLU, for
example, is provided and packaged as 'mesa-libGLU'; 'libGL' cannot be find with
'dn
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118
--- Comment #64 from Antonio Trande 2016-02-18 10:45:31
CET ---
(In reply to comment #63)
> (In reply to comment #61)
> > What I proposed as patch seems fix them:
> >
> > --- a/guicast/Makefile.am
> > +++ b/guicast/Makefile.am
> > @@ -1,7 +1,7
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118
--- Comment #63 from Sérgio Basto 2016-02-18 03:35:42 CET
---
(In reply to comment #61)
> What I proposed as patch seems fix them:
>
> --- a/guicast/Makefile.am
> +++ b/guicast/Makefile.am
> @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
> lib_LTLIBRARIES = libguicast.la
>
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rdie...@math.unl.edu
--- Comment #62 from R
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118
--- Comment #61 from Antonio Trande 2016-02-17 21:51:44
CET ---
>- undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libguicast.so.1.0.0
> Probably, needs a link to the libquicktimehv library
Undefined symbols are still there
cinelerra-cv.x86_64: W: unde
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118
--- Comment #60 from Sérgio Basto 2016-02-17 00:51:25 CET
---
SPEC: http://www.serjux.com/cinelerra-cv/SOURCES/cinelerra-cv.spec
SRPM:
http://www.serjux.com/cinelerra-cv/SOURCES/cinelerra-cv-2.3-8.20160216git5aa9bc2.fc23.src.rpm
The patch to th
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118
--- Comment #59 from Antonio Trande 2016-02-15 17:31:13
CET ---
(In reply to comment #58)
> (In reply to comment #57)
> > (In reply to comment #56)
> > > Antonio, thanks for the effort, but I give up on pack this package ,
> > > upstream
> > >
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118
--- Comment #58 from Sérgio Basto 2016-02-15 17:02:21 CET
---
(In reply to comment #57)
> (In reply to comment #56)
> > Antonio, thanks for the effort, but I give up on pack this package ,
> > upstream
> > still working on a version from 90's a
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118
--- Comment #57 from Antonio Trande 2016-02-15 12:32:24
CET ---
(In reply to comment #56)
> Antonio, thanks for the effort, but I give up on pack this package , upstream
> still working on a version from 90's and I don't have time.
Do you mean
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118
--- Comment #56 from Sérgio Basto 2016-02-13 22:16:44 CET
---
Antonio, thanks for the effort, but I give up on pack this package , upstream
still working on a version from 90's and I don't have time.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmf
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118
--- Comment #55 from Antonio Trande 2016-01-15 20:37:16
CET ---
Created attachment 1546
--> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/attachment.cgi?id=1546
Proposed patch
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
---
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118
--- Comment #54 from Antonio Trande 2016-01-15 20:36:15
CET ---
Created attachment 1545
--> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/attachment.cgi?id=1545
Proposed spec file
(In reply to comment #52)
>
> - AutoTools: Obsoleted m4s found
> AC_PROG_L
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118
--- Comment #53 from Antonio Trande 2016-01-15 14:48:47
CET ---
Created attachment 1544
--> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/attachment.cgi?id=1544
review.txt
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
---
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118
--- Comment #52 from Antonio Trande 2016-01-15 14:47:56
CET ---
Review file is very long, I'm leaving it as attached.
Issues:
===
- Please, use V=1 option with 'make'
- Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
Note: Using both
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118
--- Comment #51 from Sérgio Basto 2016-01-15 05:16:19 CET
---
I have to disable hardened to build on F23
SPEC: http://www.serjux.com/cinelerra-cv/SOURCES/cinelerra-cv.spec
SRPM:
http://www.serjux.com/cinelerra-cv/SOURCES/cinelerra-cv-2.3-7.20
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118
--- Comment #50 from Antonio Trande 2016-01-04 20:55:07
CET ---
@Sergio
Are we stuck for some reason?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118
--- Comment #49 from Antonio Trande 2015-12-21 19:27:32
CET ---
(In reply to comment #46)
> SPEC: http://www.serjux.com/cinelerra-cv/SOURCES/cinelerra-cv.spec
> SRPM:
> http://www.serjux.com/cinelerra-cv/SOURCES/cinelerra-cv-2.3-5.20151005gitd18
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|ASSIGNED
Blocks|2
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anto.tra...@gmail.com
--- Comment #48 f
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118
Hans de Goede changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|j.w.r.dego...@gmail.com |rpmfusion-package-review@rp
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118
Sérgio Basto changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|3 |2
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118
--- Comment #46 from Sérgio Basto 2015-10-06 02:40:48 CEST
---
SPEC: http://www.serjux.com/cinelerra-cv/SOURCES/cinelerra-cv.spec
SRPM:
http://www.serjux.com/cinelerra-cv/SOURCES/cinelerra-cv-2.3-5.20151005gitd189a04.fc21.src.rpm
I hosted pack
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118
--- Comment #45 from Sérgio Basto 2015-09-22 09:07:19 CEST
---
SPEC: http://www.serjux.com/cinelerra-cv/SOURCES/cinelerra-cv.spec
SRPM:
http://www.serjux.com/cinelerra-cv/SOURCES/cinelerra-cv-2.3-3.20150912gitc25d3b1.fc21.src.rpm
News:
- cinele
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118
--- Comment #44 from Sérgio Basto 2014-05-29 14:07:51 CEST
---
Petter Reinholdtsen had added this comments :
http://lists.cinelerra-cv.org/pipermail/cinelerra/2014q2/000675.html
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118
--- Comment #43 from Sérgio Basto 2014-05-29 14:02:05 CEST
---
Hi, kwizart
I'm trying upstream libmpeg3_system.patch [1] made by you or at least mention
on reviews/cinelerra-cv [2] and in cinelerra-cv mailing list [3] they ask me :
Why do cine
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118
--- Comment #42 from Sérgio Basto 2014-05-27 18:54:27 CEST
---
RPM: http://www.serjux.com/cinelerra-cv/SOURCES/cinelerra-cv.spec
SPEC:
http://www.serjux.com/cinelerra-cv/SOURCES/cinelerra-cv-2.2.1-0.5.20140525gitef4fddb.fc20.src.rpm
added:
Pa
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118
--- Comment #41 from Sérgio Basto 2014-05-01 03:26:16 CEST
---
RPM: http://www.serjux.com/cinelerra-cv/SOURCES/cinelerra-cv.spec
SPEC:
http://www.serjux.com/cinelerra-cv/SOURCES/cinelerra-cv-2.2.1-0.3.20140426git9154825.fc20.src.rpm
* Wed Apr 3
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118
Stephen Roylance changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||royla...@corplink.com.au
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118
--- Comment #39 from Sérgio Basto 2014-04-30 02:58:28 CEST
---
SRPM: http://www.serjux.com/cinelerra-cv/SOURCES/cinelerra-cv.spec
SPEC:
http://www.serjux.com/cinelerra-cv/SOURCES/cinelerra-cv-2.2.1-0.2.20140426git9154825.fc19.src.rpm
* Tue Apr
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118
--- Comment #38 from Sérgio Basto 2014-04-28 20:49:29 CEST
---
(In reply to comment #37)
> You should drop a file in /etc/sysctl.d instead to tweaking /etc/sysctl.conf
> Please drop theses coward comments (-d libswscale), packager using that was
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118
--- Comment #37 from Nicolas Chauvet 2014-04-28 14:19:03
CEST ---
You should drop a file in /etc/sysctl.d instead to tweaking /etc/sysctl.conf
Please drop theses coward comments (-d libswscale), packager using that was
nuts.
gcc-g++ is an implic
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118
Sérgio Basto changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|WONTFIX
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118
Hans de Goede changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118
--- Comment #34 from John Griffiths 2012-02-21
07:11:44 CET ---
I have used kdenlive to import DV using Firewire (1394).
(In reply to comment #32)
> Hi Sergio,
>
> thanks for the really quick answer!
>
> I was not aware of "openshot" and "kde
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118
Richard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hobbes1...@gmail.com
--- Comment #33 from Rich
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118
--- Comment #32 from Piergiorgio Sartor
2012-02-20 21:18:55 CET ---
(In reply to comment #31)
> (In reply to comment #30)
> > Hi all,
> >
> > how is it going with this?
> >
> > It seems that F-16 is without any non-linear video editor, since "
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118
Sérgio Basto changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ser...@serjux.com
--- Comment #31 from Sé
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118
Piergiorgio Sartor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||piergiorgio.sar...@nexgo.de
--- Com
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118
Bug 118 depends on bug 1346, which changed state.
Bug 1346 Summary: x264 needs a newer version (rawhide)
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1346
What|Old Value |New Value
--
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118
Hans de Goede changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||3
Status|NEW
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118
--- Comment #28 from PFJ 2010-12-20 22:53:01 ---
Still interested in doing this package - feel free to do the review :)
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118
--- Comment #27 from Hans de Goede 2010-12-16
08:33:48 ---
I guess this one is mainly blocking on me reviewing PFJ's new versions. PFJ are
you still interested in this? Then I'll make some time to review this. And
sorry for not getting aroun
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118
--- Comment #26 from John Griffiths 2010-12-15
22:53:17 ---
(In reply to comment #25)
> Any improvement in this area ? (or shall we switch to Lumiera already ?)
>
I have started compiling cinelera from source. The maintainer of the rpmfusi
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118
--- Comment #25 from NicolasChauvet 2010-12-15 22:44:49 ---
Any improvement in this area ? (or shall we switch to Lumiera already ?)
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118
sHINOBI changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mi...@tnet.cz
--- Comment #24 from sHINOBI
Hi,
> You can use this command to create a proper tarball:
>
> git archive --format=tar --prefix=cinelerra/ master | gzip -9 >
> cinelerra-cv-2.1-git$(date +%Y%m%d).tar.gz
Yeah, that doesn't seem to be working...
TTFN
Paul
--
Vertraue mir, ich weiss, was ich mache...
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118
Lorenzo Villani changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lvill...@binaryhelix.net
--- Commen
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118
--- Comment #22 from PFJ 2010-07-29 08:50:28 ---
Scrub the last one...
http://www.all-the-johnsons.co.uk/fedora/cinelerra-cv-2.1-25.git20100726.fc14.i686.rpm
http://www.all-the-johnsons.co.uk/fedora/cinelerra-cv-docs-2.1-25.git20100726.fc14
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118
--- Comment #21 from PFJ 2010-07-29 08:48:49 ---
RPMS to test
http://www.all-the-johnsons.co.uk/fedora/cinelerra-cv-2.1-26.git20100726.fc14.i686.rpm
http://www.all-the-johnsons.co.uk/fedora/cinelerra-cv-docs-2.1-26.git20100726.fc14.i686.rp
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118
--- Comment #20 from KAR 2010-07-28 12:46:13 ---
(In reply to comment #19)
>
> Uploading now. Should be up in the next 10 minutes
>
Will there be a binary RPM in the repo soon to test out?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118
--- Comment #19 from PFJ 2010-07-28 08:49:42 ---
spec file : http://www.all-the-johnsons.co.uk/fedora/cinelerra-cv.spec
srpm :
http://www.all-the-johnsons.co.uk/fedora/cinelerra-cv-2.1-25.git20100726.fc14.src.rpm
Uploading now. Should be up
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118
--- Comment #18 from PFJ 2010-07-27 12:37:21 ---
Found a small problem in that bitstream-vera-fonts is no longer called that.
Anyway, current spec file fixes it. It builds in mock on my machine, so I'll
upload the new spec and tarball later t
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118
--- Comment #17 from PFJ 2010-07-26 00:08:49 ---
spec file : http://www.all-the-johnsons.co.uk/fedora/cinelerra-cv.spec
srpm :
http://www.all-the-johnsons.co.uk/fedora/cinelerra-cv-2.1-24.git20100724.fc14.src.rpm
Everything in #2 fixed.
Adde
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118
--- Comment #16 from PFJ 2010-07-25 23:15:26 ---
New!
spec file : http://www.all-the-johnsons.co.uk/fedora/cinelerra-cv.spec
srpm :
http://www.all-the-johnsons.co.uk/fedora/cinelerra-cv-2.1-23.git20100724.fc14.src.rpm
I've addressed quite a
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118
PFJ changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||1346
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpm
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118
--- Comment #15 from PFJ 2010-07-25 13:24:30 ---
Thanks. I've corrected quite a few of the issues already raised in the review,
but there are a shed load of problems in getting the damned thing to even think
about compiling currently!
--
C
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118
--- Comment #14 from Hans de Goede 2010-07-25
09:46:25 ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> I'm happy to try and get this package moving again. It might be a bit slow to
> start off with, but I should have something soon using the snapshot from l
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118
PFJ changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||p...@all-the-johnsons.co.uk
--- Comment #13 fro
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118
KAR changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ke...@karsites.net
--- Comment #12 from KAR 2
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118
Me changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||linuxguy...@gmail.com
--- Comment #11 from Me
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118
Orcan Ogetbil changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||oget.fed...@gmail.com
--- Comment #10
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118
--- Comment #9 from Andrea Musuruane 2009-06-04 11:36:50
---
Ping.
Is there a problem with this review? It seems it is stalled.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this ma
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118
Andrew Ziem changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ahz...@gmail.com
--- Comment #8 from An
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118
--- Comment #7 from John Griffiths 2009-02-14 17:26:17
---
The problem has nothing to do with selinux.
Every frame results in:
[swscaler @ 0x9eb46a0]Slices start in the middle!
when trying to render using YUV4MPEG. Rendering usin
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118
--- Comment #6 from John Griffiths <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-12-03 18:21:47 ---
I set selinux to Permissive and tried to render again. Still nothing but green.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
-
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118
--- Comment #5 from NicolasChauvet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-12-03 18:11:57 ---
thx for the report. I do think you can have silent denial with selinux (maybe).
It would be fine if you can set selinux in permissive.
I will update the F-10 cinel
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118
John Griffiths <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118
--- Comment #3 from Matthias Saou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-04 12:46:14 ---
I'm fine with you being the primary maintainer. I've only packaged cinelerra
because I used it for a few video edits of mine (but none recently).
I'm not entirely c
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118
--- Comment #2 from Kevin Kofler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-04 12:34:53 ---
I don't see what's wrong with setting _default_patch_fuzz, it saves a lot of
work when updating to new versions. I think RPM's new paranoid default is a bad
idea.
-
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118
Hans de Goede <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|rpmfusion-package- |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118
Hans de Goede <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comme
87 matches
Mail list logo
