https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1936
Sérgio Basto changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Blocks|2, 3912
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1936
--- Comment #20 from salsaman 2015-12-21 15:55:25 CET ---
Minimal set of dependencies (for ubuntu) is currently:
mplayer / mplayer2 imageMagick sox perl libpulse-dev (libavcodec-dev
libavformat-dev libavutil-dev libswscale-dev) OR (ffmpeg_libs)
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1936
--- Comment #19 from Sérgio Basto 2015-12-21 15:34:54 CET
---
Updating Russian fedora link:
http://koji.russianfedora.pro/koji/packageinfo?packageID=36
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You a
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1936
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||3912
--- Comment #18 from Antonio Tran
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1936
--- Comment #17 from salsaman 2012-01-04 00:29:56 CET ---
As far as I know (as the author of libweed), LiVES is the only program which
uses it. I would be very surprised if it were otherwise.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.or
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1936
--- Comment #16 from Richard 2012-01-03 23:22:40 CET ---
Assuming we want to package it here...
Could we not make an exception and just package libweed as a sub-package? Is
there any other software that uses libweed?
Richard
--
Configure bug
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1936
--- Comment #15 from salsaman 2011-12-09 23:38:57 CET ---
Russian fedora is already packaging this:
http://koji.russianfedora.ru/koji/packageinfo?packageID=185
you just need to mirror this maybe.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfus
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1936
--- Comment #14 from Richard 2011-12-09 23:00:37 CET ---
I did some searching for libweed on other distrobutions. Apparently both
Debian, Suse, and Mandriva both package libweed separately. We should probably
do the same.
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1936
Richard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kwiz...@gmail.com
--- Comment #13 from Ric
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1936
--- Comment #12 from Kevin Kofler 2011-09-27 01:22:22
---
Does anything other than LiVES use libweed? To me, this looks like a
convenience library (i.e. something that's clearly part of LiVES source code),
not like a bundled library, even i
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1936
--- Comment #11 from Richard 2011-09-26 22:47:57 ---
Updating my previous comments:
(In reply to comment #5)
> Some suggestions:
>
> 1. You don't need "lives_version". Just put the version in the Version: field
> and you can use %{version}
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1936
--- Comment #10 from Richard 2011-09-26 22:46:30 ---
Is the problem that libweed is ok in Fedora proper and LiVES is not, but they
are both provided in the same source archive?
I understand that we generally should not host packages at RPM
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1936
--- Comment #9 from Sérgio Basto 2011-09-26 20:53:59 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> As stated in https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=746#c1
> The libweed library need to be splitted off from the lives distribution.
>
but libweed
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1936
--- Comment #8 from Richard 2011-09-26 20:20:29 ---
Also, I forgot to mention that use of the "%makeinstall" macro is depreciated.
Unless "make DESTDIR=%{buildroot} install" doesn't work (or can't be made to
work) I would avoid it.
Richard
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1936
--- Comment #7 from Nicolas Chauvet 2011-09-26 20:04:17 ---
As stated in https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=746#c1
The libweed library need to be splitted off from the lives distribution.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1936
--- Comment #6 from Sérgio Basto 2011-09-26 19:52:50 ---
adding another suggestion:
I have to add desktop-file-utils on BuildRequires,
to built with mock
mock -r fedora-15-x86_64-rpmfusion_nonfree --resultdir=results/ --buildsrpm
--spe
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1936
Richard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hobbes1...@gmail.com
--- Comment #5 from R
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1936
Sérgio Basto changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ser...@serjux.com
--- Comment #4 from
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1936
--- Comment #3 from Xavier Bachelot 2011-09-14 18:01:26
---
Oops, sorry. Anyway, #746 might still contains useful information for this
review. Sorry again for the noise.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1936
--- Comment #2 from Andrea Musuruane 2011-09-14 17:37:17
---
Actually #746 is closed as WONTFIX.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1936
Xavier Bachelot changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xav...@bachelot.org
--- Comment #1
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1936
Dmitry Antipov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2
--
Configure bugmail: http://bug
22 matches
Mail list logo
