https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2405
Nicolas Chauvet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|3 |
Referenced
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2405
Nicolas Chauvet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2405
Karel Volný kvo...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2405
Karel Volný kvo...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2405
--- Comment #2 from Patrick Uiterwijk puiterw...@gmail.com 2012-08-15
01:49:46 CEST ---
* I will look into the data files. I didn't add them because they're a
different source.
* The reason for the svn checkout is because the released version
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2405
--- Comment #3 from Patrick Uiterwijk puiterw...@gmail.com 2012-08-15
01:52:12 CEST ---
I do, however, agree that I would need to edit the version to match the
guidelines correctly, by putting the svn checkout date and revision id in
Release,
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2405
Patrick Uiterwijk puiterw...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2
--