http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2444
Nicolas Chauvet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #29 from Ni
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2444
--- Comment #28 from Nicolas Chauvet ---
Please note that we cannot create el7 branches yet.
Please create a pkgdb request, thoses will be proceeded once possible.
Thx
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2444
Nicolas Chauvet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|33 |
Referenced Bugs:
http://bugzilla.rp
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2444
Stuart Gathman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||33
--- Comment #27 from Stuart Gathman
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2444
--- Comment #26 from leigh scott ---
Just a comment, the summary is lame imo
"A dynamic MP encoding fuse file-system"
where is the 3?
"A dynamic MP3 encoding fuse file-system"
TBH I prefer the debian summary
"FUSE filesystem for transcodin
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2444
--- Comment #25 from Stuart Gathman ---
Waiting for Internal Error on fas.rpmfusion.org to get fixed so I can create an
account. In the mean time, updated SPEC:
SPEC: https://gathman.org/linux/SPECS/mp3fs.spec
SRPM: https://gathman.org/linux/f
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2444
--- Comment #24 from leigh scott ---
Can you explain this please, Provides: mp3encoder = 0.91
also remove the space from (should be Summary:).
Summary : A dynamic MP encoding fuse file-system
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2444
leigh scott changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||3, 4
Assignee|rpmfusion-package-
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2444
--- Comment #22 from Stuart Gathman ---
Ping?
All issues addressed - awaiting approval or more feedback.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2444
--- Comment #21 from Stuart Gathman ---
Adding the documentation license to License:
License: GPLv3+ and FDL
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2444
--- Comment #20 from Stuart Gathman ---
Updated in place:
SPEC: https://gathman.org/linux/SPECS/mp3fs.spec
SRPM: https://gathman.org/linux/f23/src/mp3fs-0.91-2.fc23.src.rpm
The 'fuse' package is not picked up by auto-depend, because it just has
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2444
--- Comment #19 from leigh scott ---
(In reply to Stuart Gathman from comment #18)
> Update to 0.91 and update github URL:
>
> SPEC: https://gathman.org/linux/SPECS/mp3fs.spec
> SRPM: https://gathman.org/linux/f23/src/mp3fs-0.91-2.fc23.src.rpm
>
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2444
--- Comment #18 from Stuart Gathman ---
Update to 0.91 and update github URL:
SPEC: https://gathman.org/linux/SPECS/mp3fs.spec
SRPM: https://gathman.org/linux/f23/src/mp3fs-0.91-2.fc23.src.rpm
$ rpmlint mp3fs-0.91-2* ~/rpm/SPECS/mp3fs.spec
2 pa
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2444
Sérgio Basto changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ser...@serjux.com
--- Comment #17 from Sé
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2444
leigh scott changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||leigh123li...@gmail.com
Blocks
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2444
Stuart Gathman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|WONTFIX
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2444
Richard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Blocks|
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2444
Andrea Musuruane changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||musur...@gmail.com
--- Comment #13 f
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2444
Richard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hobbes1...@gmail.com
--- Comment #12 from Ric
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2444
--- Comment #11 from Stuart Gathman 2014-01-29 23:14:28
CET ---
I submitted this package quite some time ago. Did I miss something? Was there
a next step I was supposed to take? I don't believe I have priv to build on
the official build syst
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2444
Alec Leamas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||leamas.a...@gmail.com
--- Comment #10 fro
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2444
--- Comment #9 from Bill McGonigle
2014-01-10 13:43:34 CET ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> and post the output from rpmlint again.
SPECS]$ rpmlint fuse-mp3fs.spec ../SRPMS/fuse-mp3fs-0.32-2.fc19.src.rpm
1 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 er
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2444
--- Comment #8 from Bill McGonigle
2014-01-10 13:30:31 CET ---
Thank you for the excellent advice, Martin!
SPEC: https://www.bfccomputing.com/downloads/fedora/mp3fs/fuse-mp3fs.spec
SRPM:
https://www.bfccomputing.com/downloads/fedora/mp3fs/fuse
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2444
--- Comment #7 from MartinKG 2014-01-09 11:09:01 CET ---
please correct the version numbering in %changelog section
and post the output from rpmlint again.
rpmlint fuse-mp3fs-0.32.53-2.fc20.x86_64.rpm
fuse-mp3fs.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-i
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2444
--- Comment #6 from MartinKG 2014-01-09 10:19:43 CET ---
please correct your spec file.
1. please put %global definitions into top of the spec file.
2. %clean tag no logner needed.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#.25clean
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2444
Bill McGonigle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bill-bugzilla.rpmfusion.org
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2444
--- Comment #4 from MartinKG 2012-10-12 13:51:27 CEST ---
Looks much better; the only I would note is adding a blank line between
changelog entries. Obviously not a breaking issue and doesn't need a rebuild or
a new revision. Just for future cha
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2444
Xavier Bachelot changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xav...@bachelot.org
--- Comment #3 fr
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2444
--- Comment #2 from Stuart Gathman 2012-10-11 15:14:36
CEST ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> a few notes:
>
> BuildRoot tag isn't required in the spec file
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag
> same with clean
> ht
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2444
MartinKG changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mgans...@alice.de
--- Comment #1 from Martin
30 matches
Mail list logo
