http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26
David Timms changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26
Thorsten Leemhuis changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|33 |
--- Comment #43 from Thorsten Lee
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26
David Timms changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||33
--- Comment #42 from David Timms 20
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26
Andrea Musuruane changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|3 |4
--- Comment #41 from Andrea Musur
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26
--- Comment #40 from David Timms 2009-01-01 00:13:36 ---
(In reply to comment #39)
> [-] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming
> Guidelines.
> Use an %{alphatag} beginning with the date in MMDD format
>
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26
Andrea Musuruane changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||musur...@gmail.com
Blocks|
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26
--- Comment #38 from David Timms 2008-12-31 13:07:54 ---
buuurp: oops put that beer down ;) Only an hour until new year for me... thanks
for your patience, Andrea.
src:
http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/dvbcut/dvbcut-0.5.4-5.20081218.fc10.sr
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26
--- Comment #37 from Andrea Musuruane 2008-12-31 12:46:11
---
(In reply to comment #36)
> http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/dvbcut/dvbcut-0.5.4-5.20081218.fc9.src.rpm
Not found.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userpr
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26
--- Comment #36 from David Timms 2008-12-31 12:22:17 ---
spec: http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/dvbcut/dvbcut.spec
srpm:
http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/dvbcut/dvbcut-0.5.4-5.20081218.fc9.src.rpm
- include Andrea's improvements to the
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26
--- Comment #35 from Andrea Musuruane 2008-12-31 11:47:47
---
(In reply to comment #34)
> > - removed %%{?_smp_mflags} from make invocation
> > It was because of smp_flags that the rpmbuild process didn't run the
> > setversion.sh script.
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26
--- Comment #34 from David Timms 2008-12-31 06:32:27 ---
(In reply to comment #33)
> Changelog:
> - removed ugly configure hack in %%install
> A much needed improvement. You must report upstream that there is no clean
> way to specify a DE
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26
--- Comment #33 from Andrea Musuruane 2008-12-29 16:20:27
---
I've improved your spec file. It is attached to this bug report. Please, let me
know what you think.
Changelog:
- removed ugly configure hack in %%install
A much needed improv
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26
--- Comment #32 from Andrea Musuruane 2008-12-29 16:15:28
---
Created an attachment (id=65)
--> (http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/attachment.cgi?id=65)
Improved spec file
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26
--- Comment #31 from David Timms 2008-12-26 07:03:48 ---
(In reply to comment #30)
> It seems to me that the problem is that configure looks for the library in
> /usr/lib64/qt-3.3/lib64/ and not in /usr/lib64/qt-3.3/lib/.
OK, needed to force
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26
--- Comment #30 from Andrea Musuruane 2008-12-23 10:56:33
---
(In reply to comment #29)
> Looks like x86_64 issue ? I'll try to mock and get a x86_64 going.
It seems to me that the problem is that configure looks for the library in
/usr/lib6
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26
--- Comment #29 from David Timms 2008-12-22 22:34:01 ---
(In reply to comment #28)
> There's no libqt.so in Fedora, it's the obsolete build of Qt with thread
> support disabled, nothing should try to link that version. qt-mt is what
> should
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26
--- Comment #28 from Kevin Kofler 2008-12-22 20:08:03
---
There's no libqt.so in Fedora, it's the obsolete build of Qt with thread
support disabled, nothing should try to link that version. qt-mt is what should
be linked to in Qt 3 apps. (Tha
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26
--- Comment #27 from Andrea Musuruane 2008-12-22 19:33:38
---
Problem is that both libqt and libqt-mt are not found. On my system I have
libqt-mt but not the former with the BR you require.
$ locate libqt
/usr/lib64/qt-3.3/lib/libqt-mt.prl
/
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26
--- Comment #26 from Andrea Musuruane 2008-12-22 19:14:06
---
(In reply to comment #24)
> (can you rpm -qa qt3\* |sort for me ?)
$ rpm -qa qt3\* |sort
qt3-3.3.8b-17.fc10.x86_64
qt3-devel-3.3.8b-17.fc10.x86_64
--
Configure bugmail: http://
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26
--- Comment #25 from Andrea Musuruane 2008-12-22 14:56:00
---
(In reply to comment #24)
> (In reply to comment #23)
> > I still cannot build on F10/x86_64.
> "* ...it does not build at least under F9/i386."
> Is that a different machine ?
Ye
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26
--- Comment #24 from David Timms 2008-12-22 14:31:46 ---
(In reply to comment #23)
> I still cannot build on F10/x86_64.
"* ...it does not build at least under F9/i386."
Is that a different machine ?
Do you think this will be missing BR's ? (m
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26
--- Comment #23 from Andrea Musuruane 2008-12-21 16:10:41
---
I still cannot build on F10/x86_64. I get the following error when running
configure:
[...]
checking for getpagesize... yes
checking for working mmap... yes
checking for main in -l
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26
--- Comment #22 from David Timms 2008-12-21 05:01:23 ---
updated spec:
http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/dvbcut/dvbcut.spec
srpm:
http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/dvbcut/dvbcut-0.5.4-0.13.20081218.fc9.src.rpm
- remove execute permission
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26
--- Comment #21 from David Timms 2008-12-21 03:50:49 ---
updated spec:
http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/dvbcut/dvbcut.spec
srpm:
http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/dvbcut/dvbcut-0.5.4-0.12.20081218.fc9.src.rpm
- fix generation of debuginf
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26
--- Comment #20 from David Timms 2008-12-20 14:31:50 ---
(In reply to comment #19)
> Ping me for reviewing it :)
updated spec:
http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/dvbcut/dvbcut.spec
srpm:
http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/dvbcut/dvbcut-0.5.
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26
--- Comment #19 from Andrea Musuruane 2008-12-16 14:38:30
---
(In reply to comment #17)
> If you were to do full review, would you want to see the intermediate steps,
> or
> just the final converted to be current svn + autotool build changes
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26
--- Comment #18 from Andrea Musuruane 2008-12-16 14:33:08
---
(In reply to comment #16)
> (In reply to comment #15)
> > this would not be required if the package would own that directory ... ;-)
> But I can't do that, can I, since on a real s
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26
--- Comment #17 from David Timms 2008-12-16 14:28:57 ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> Some quick notes:
>
> * Compile process does not use {%optflags}. At least this is what I see when
> compiling the first file because...
>
> * ...it does no
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26
--- Comment #16 from David Timms 2008-12-16 14:16:07 ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> this would not be required if the package would own that directory ... ;-)
But I can't do that, can I, since on a real system that package would already
be ow
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26
--- Comment #15 from Karel Volný 2008-12-15 17:56:38 ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> * Missing Requires: hicolor-icon-theme. This is required because
> %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/ directories are owned by this package.
this would not be requir
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26
Andrea Musuruane changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|musur...@gmail.com |
--- Comment #14 from Andrea Musuru
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26
Andrea Musuruane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26
--- Comment #12 from David Timms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-07-01 15:06:30 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> You don't need a sponsor because you have been already sponsored in Fedora.
Calling anyone prepared to do the official review: perhaps you
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26
--- Comment #11 from David Timms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-06-25 23:54:42 ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> srpm: oops ;)
http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/dvbcut/dvbcut-0.5.4-0.8.20080621svn131.fc9.src.rpm
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzil
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26
--- Comment #10 from David Timms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-06-25 15:39:27 ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> Just a slight addition, a name change for qt between f8 & f9
> qt in f9 is == qt4 in f8 hence somthing like this should do the trick:
I was
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26
--- Comment #9 from dexter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-06-24 15:28:59 ---
Just a slight addition, a name change for qt between f8 & f9
qt in f9 is == qt4 in f8 hence somthing like this should do the trick:
%if 0%{fedora} > 8
Buildrequires qt3-dev
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26
--- Comment #8 from Andrea Musuruane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-06-21 09:47:31
---
(In reply to comment #7)
> I would be needing a reviewer and sponsor since this is my first rpmfusion
> package.
You don't need a sponsor because you have been
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26
--- Comment #7 from David Timms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-06-21 04:47:03 ---
Updated spec:
http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/dvbcut/dvbcut.spec
srpm:
http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/dvbcut/dvbcut-0.5.4-0.7.20080621svn131.fc9.src.rpm
An F9
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26
--- Comment #6 from David Timms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-03-14 16:42:20 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > - del BuildRequires gettext desktop-file-utils since they aren't required.
>
> You are using desktop-file-insta
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26
Sebastian Vahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26
--- Comment #4 from David Timms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-03-01 05:47:45 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> In fact I'll attach the full spec to give you ideas.
dexter: were you planning on submitting the package to rpmfusion ?
Meanwhile: Updated
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26
--- Comment #3 from dexter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-02-29 18:50:33 ---
Created an attachment (id=4)
--> (http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/attachment.cgi?id=4)
dvbcut.dex.spec
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?ta
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26
dexter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comm
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26
--- Comment #1 from David Timms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-02-29 15:05:50 ---
I request some assistance with improving the package:
1. Since I'm using a post release svn checkout, and the inbuilt ffmpeg is not
being used {ie linking against ffmp
44 matches
Mail list logo
