https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3953
Nicolas Chauvet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3953
Ben Rosser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||4639
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.r
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3953
leigh scott changed:
What|Removed |Added
namespace||nonfree
--- Comment #15 from leigh scott
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3953
--- Comment #14 from Ben Rosser ---
> Denied! please use the proper namespace (not rpm) next time.
Oh... my bad.
It's a shame we can't just get rid of the rpms namespace from this version of
pkgdb. :(
Anyway, resubmitted, sorry for the troubl
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3953
leigh scott changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||leigh123li...@gmail.com
--- Comment #13 f
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3953
Sérgio Basto changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ser...@serjux.com
--- Comment #12 from S
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3953
--- Comment #11 from Ben Rosser ---
Thanks for the review! I'll fix those issues on import.
Branches requested via pkgdb.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug._
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3953
Nicolas Chauvet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #10 from N
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3953
--- Comment #9 from Ben Rosser ---
Spec URL:
https://www.acm.jhu.edu/~bjr/fedora/dwarffortress/rpmfusion/dwarffortress.spec
SRPM URL:
https://www.acm.jhu.edu/~bjr/fedora/dwarffortress/rpmfusion/dwarffortress-0.43.05-6.fc26.src.rpm
- Write and i
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3953
Nicolas Chauvet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|2 |
--- Comment #8 from Nicolas Chauvet
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3953
--- Comment #7 from Ben Rosser ---
I've cleaned up the spec, removing the commented out blocks. I also put all the
BRs on their own lines and cleaned out some redundant ones.
I also changed the ExclusiveArch tag to i686 instead of using the mac
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3953
Nicolas Chauvet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|rpmfusion
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3953
--- Comment #5 from Ben Rosser 2016-07-24 05:17:56 CEST
---
With the release of 0.43.05, dwarffortress can now run on both 32-bit and
64-bit x86 machines! I have updated the ExclusiveArch tag appropriately.
It's a bit of a pain because there a
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3953
--- Comment #4 from Ben Rosser 2016-06-18 05:15:38 CEST
---
I forgot to update this ticket when 0.43.03 was released.
I've been working on packaging dfhack (which is _not_ ready for review; dfhack
bundles a large number of libraries and seriou
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3953
Ben Rosser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||4059
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzil
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3953
--- Comment #3 from Ben Rosser 2016-05-12 23:03:44 CEST
---
A new version of Dwarf Fortress, 0.43.02, has been released. I have updated the
package.
Spec URL:
https://www.acm.jhu.edu/~bjr/fedora/dwarffortress/rpmfusion/dwarffortress.spec
SRPM
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3953
--- Comment #2 from Ben Rosser 2016-05-10 21:47:16 CEST
---
A new version of Dwarf Fortress, 0.43.01, has been released. I have updated the
package.
Spec URL:
https://www.acm.jhu.edu/~bjr/fedora/dwarffortress/rpmfusion/dwarffortress.spec
SRPM
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3953
--- Comment #1 from Ben Rosser 2016-02-20 22:22:17 CET
---
New version of the upstream package, 0.42.06 was released:
Spec URL:
https://www.acm.jhu.edu/~bjr/fedora/dwarffortress/rpmfusion/dwarffortress.spec
SRPM URL:
https://www.acm.jhu.edu/~b
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3953
Ben Rosser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.
19 matches
Mail list logo
