https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4224
Nicolas Chauvet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|2 |
Referenced
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4224
Nicolas Chauvet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4224
Bug 4224 depends on bug 4225, which changed state.
Bug 4225 Summary: Review Request: ffms2 - Wrapper library around libffmpeg
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4225
What|Removed |Added
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4224
--- Comment #18 from Cyril Richard ---
@Nicolas
You probably right. we will think about the fact to use dlopen in next release.
Maybe it could be the easiest thing to do.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4224
--- Comment #17 from Nicolas Chauvet ---
(In reply to Cyril Richard from comment #16)
...
> Does the idea is ok for you ?
This is okay as long as you have a maintainer for each package (it can be the
same person or not).
On a
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4224
--- Comment #16 from Cyril Richard ---
After a discussion here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1371502
We've decided to update siril in official Fedora by removing problematic
dependencies. Indeed, apparently it
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4224
--- Comment #15 from Cyril Richard ---
(In reply to Nicolas Chauvet from comment #13)
>
> Now best is to have packages in fedora, not the reverse. So it would be fine
> to ask upstream if possible to use gstreamer instead of
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4224
--- Comment #14 from Cyril Richard ---
@Nicolas.
I'm also upstream, and sadly this is not in our future plans yet.
Having this package in RPM Fusion would be great however.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4224
--- Comment #13 from Nicolas Chauvet ---
(In reply to Cyril Richard from comment #12)
> @Nicolas:
> > @Cyril, please create an account in fas.rpmfusion.org
>
> Done. My login is lock.
>
> Can we easily removed Siril 0.8
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4224
--- Comment #12 from Cyril Richard ---
@Nicolas:
> @Cyril, please create an account in fas.rpmfusion.org
Done. My login is lock.
Can we easily removed Siril 0.8 from official repository to go further ?
--
You are
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4224
--- Comment #11 from Andrea Musuruane ---
(In reply to Nicolas Chauvet from comment #10)
> @Andrea
> Can you go ahead with the review ? I will sponsor Cyril in fas once reviewed
> and the fedora package retired.
@Nicolas
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4224
--- Comment #9 from Cyril Richard 2016-08-31 15:36:38 CEST
---
So everything is ok for me ?
I have to wait that fedora remove the previous version ?
That's it ? How I will know that ?
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4224
--- Comment #8 from Cyril Richard 2016-08-30 15:04:15 CEST
---
(In reply to comment #7)
> (In reply to comment #6)
> > This is my very first RPM package so it is new for me as I come from debian.
> > Apparently I need a RPM
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4224
Andrea Musuruane changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||30
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4224
--- Comment #6 from Cyril Richard 2016-08-30 14:46:18 CEST
---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Please follow RPM Fusion process:
> http://rpmfusion.org/Contributors
How I can edit my description ?
If I can't:
- Why this
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4224
--- Comment #5 from Igor Gnatenko 2016-08-30
14:45:05 CEST ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Siril is already in Fedora proper:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/siril/
>
> As you can see the Fedora
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4224
--- Comment #4 from Cyril Richard 2016-08-30 14:44:34 CEST
---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Siril is already in Fedora proper:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/siril/
>
> As you can see the Fedora version
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4224
--- Comment #3 from Andrea Musuruane 2016-08-30 14:40:07
CEST ---
Siril is already in Fedora proper:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/siril/
As you can see the Fedora version is still maintained (neither
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4224
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4224
--- Comment #1 from Igor Gnatenko 2016-08-30
14:15:07 CEST ---
Here us the review of ffms2.
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4225
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4224
Andrea Musuruane changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||4225
--
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4224
Andrea Musuruane changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4224
Andrea Musuruane changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2
--
Configure
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4224
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
24 matches
Mail list logo