https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5114
qvint changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5114
leigh scott changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||leigh123li...@gmail.com
Block
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5114
--- Comment #22 from Akarshan Biswas ---
(In reply to Nicolas Chauvet from comment #20)
> The other point is that f29 is currently unmaintained for chromium-vaapi,
> this isn't acceptable.
That is because the dependencies which chromium depend
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5114
--- Comment #21 from qvint ---
(In reply to Nicolas Chauvet from comment #20)
> In others words make a new chromium-freeworld package with vaapi and
> "ungoogled" patches ?
ungoogled-chromium breaks a number of features of the vanilla Chromium
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5114
--- Comment #20 from Nicolas Chauvet ---
I have an issue to have two differents chromium browser in rpmfusion.
Can we investigate to have theses patches merged together with vaapi ?
What would be the downside ?
In others words make a new chromi
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5114
Akarshan Biswas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5114
--- Comment #19 from Akarshan Biswas ---
Okay , Package approved!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-develop
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5114
--- Comment #18 from Akarshan Biswas ---
(In reply to qvint from comment #17)
> Updated to 77.0.3865.90.
>
> - spec:
> https://ungoogled.blob.core.windows.net/ungoogled/review/2019-09-25_1/
> chromium-browser-privacy.spec
> - src.rpm:
> https:/
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5114
--- Comment #17 from qvint ---
Updated to 77.0.3865.90.
- spec:
https://ungoogled.blob.core.windows.net/ungoogled/review/2019-09-25_1/chromium-browser-privacy.spec
- src.rpm:
https://ungoogled.blob.core.windows.net/ungoogled/review/2019-09-25_1
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5114
--- Comment #16 from qvint ---
> You need to start a fresh changelog for the chromium-browser-privacy.
OK, I restarted the changelog:
-
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/qvint/ungoogled-chromium-fedora/88571efa5c3e11132aa74130cae2340535e6e625/
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5114
--- Comment #15 from Nicolas Chauvet ---
(In reply to Akarshan Biswas from comment #14)
...
> For NoSource,
>
> @Nicolas Is there any updates from the last time we discussed about this?
No, there is a need to implement the support in koji. Mo
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5114
--- Comment #14 from Akarshan Biswas ---
(In reply to qvint from comment #13)
> -
> https://ungoogled.blob.core.windows.net/ungoogled/review/2019-09-23_1/
> chromium-browser-privacy.spec
> -
You need to start a fresh changelog for the chromium
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5114
--- Comment #13 from qvint ---
> You need to at least provide a spec file and best would be to provide
> a nosrc.rpm so the package can be tested.
-
https://ungoogled.blob.core.windows.net/ungoogled/review/2019-09-23_1/chromium-browser-privacy
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5114
--- Comment #12 from Nicolas Chauvet ---
(In reply to qvint from comment #11)
> I'm sorry for the AWOL-ness, I'm still interested in the package. I've
> decided
> to fork the chromium-vaapi repo as it is proven to have the most up-to-date
> Chro
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5114
qvint changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|EXPIRED
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5114
Nicolas Chauvet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5114
--- Comment #9 from Akarshan Biswas ---
(In reply to Nicolas Chauvet from comment #8)
> (In reply to Akarshan Biswas from comment #7)
> ...
> > > I'm suggesting to use "chromium-browser-privacy"
> >
> > Let's wait for a day, if we receive no re
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5114
--- Comment #8 from Nicolas Chauvet ---
(In reply to Akarshan Biswas from comment #7)
...
> > I'm suggesting to use "chromium-browser-privacy"
>
> Let's wait for a day, if we receive no response then we can close it I guess.
It's usually expect
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5114
--- Comment #7 from Akarshan Biswas ---
(In reply to Nicolas Chauvet from comment #6)
> Is there original submitter still interested in this package ?
>
> Seems like it was not updated since the review request. Please reminds that
> we are not
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5114
--- Comment #6 from Nicolas Chauvet ---
Is there original submitter still interested in this package ?
Seems like it was not updated since the review request. Please reminds that we
are not a housekeeping team for packages that maintainers can
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5114
Akarshan Biswas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|rpmfusion-package-review@rp |akarshan.biswas@protonmail.
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5114
--- Comment #5 from Akarshan Biswas ---
@qvint Sorry for the long silence. Can you please update it to latest stable
provide the srpm and spec again please? I'm going to review it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5114
--- Comment #4 from qvint ---
(In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #3)
> Wouldn't the name "ungoogled" be problematic legally?
It's just a patchset name. The browser still calls itself "Chromium".
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5114
Miro Hrončok changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mhron...@redhat.com
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5114
--- Comment #2 from qvint ---
(In reply to Akarshan Biswas from comment #1)
> 1) Does it need to build headless in this package? And why is it in a single
> package? I think we already have headless in Fedora?
> 2) You have disabled debug builds
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5114
Akarshan Biswas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||akarshan.biswas@protonmail.
26 matches
Mail list logo
