Re: [RPM Fusion] Current FTBFS in F-17

2012-05-16 Thread Karel Volný
Dne St 16. května 2012 10:21:37, Nicolas Chauvet napsal(a): > >> >> ufoai (weird issue with the previous package - but there ... > While testing I've hit a FTBFS so I've fixed hit. thanks > It will worth to test ufoai-data while updating to latest. I hope I'll get to the update this weekend > C

Re: [RPM Fusion] Current FTBFS in F-17

2012-05-16 Thread Nicolas Chauvet
2012/5/15 Karel Volný : > Dne Po 14. května 2012 14:00:35, Nicolas Chauvet napsal(a): >> 2012/5/14 Karel Volný : >> > hi, >> > >> > sorry for late reply ... >> > >> >> ufoai (weird issue with the previous package - but there is >> >> a >> >> 2.4) >> > >> > I've tried to update to 2.4 but there's qu

Re: [RPM Fusion] Current FTBFS in F-17

2012-05-15 Thread Karel Volný
Dne Po 14. května 2012 14:00:35, Nicolas Chauvet napsal(a): > 2012/5/14 Karel Volný : > > hi, > > > > sorry for late reply ... > > > >> ufoai (weird issue with the previous package - but there is > >> a > >> 2.4) > > > > I've tried to update to 2.4 but there's quite a lot of > > changes > > and I h

Re: [RPM Fusion] Current FTBFS in F-17

2012-05-14 Thread Nicolas Chauvet
2012/5/14 Karel Volný : > > hi, > > sorry for late reply ... > >> ufoai (weird issue with the previous package - but there is a >> 2.4) > > I've tried to update to 2.4 but there's quite a lot of changes > and I hadn't time to cope with it :-( > > what is the "weird issue"? Probably something relat

Re: [RPM Fusion] Current FTBFS in F-17

2012-05-14 Thread Karel Volný
hi, sorry for late reply ... > ufoai (weird issue with the previous package - but there is a > 2.4) I've tried to update to 2.4 but there's quite a lot of changes and I hadn't time to cope with it :-( what is the "weird issue"? K. -- Karel Volný QE BaseOs/Daemons Team Red Hat Czech, Brno tel

Re: [RPM Fusion] Current FTBFS in F-17 - take 3

2012-05-14 Thread Andrea Musuruane
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 8:18 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > paintdotnet I think it should be orphaned. Paintdotnet source code hasn't been available for years (circa 2009). Moreover, pinta is already in Fedora. Bye, Andrea.

Re: [RPM Fusion] Current FTBFS in F-17 - take 3

2012-05-13 Thread Nicolas Chauvet
2012/5/4 Nicolas Chauvet : > 2012/5/1 Nicolas Chauvet : >> Hello, > . > Here is an updated package list, > >> Here is  the current list of packages that Fail To Build From Sources >> from the RPM Fusion 17 tree. >> This is based on the dist tag from the development/17 repo. >> >> Some of them might

Re: [RPM Fusion] Current FTBFS in F-17

2012-05-05 Thread Andrea Musuruane
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 10:05 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: >>> meka >> >> I'll work soon on meka. But instead of patching an old version, I'll >> work on the latest SVN that has a number of new interesting features >> (e.g. sound under Linux). > Good, thx I updated meka to an upstream preview of v0.

Re: [RPM Fusion] Current FTBFS in F-17 - take 2

2012-05-05 Thread Felix Kaechele
Am 04.05.2012 08:35, schrieb Nicolas Chauvet: vdr-burn (orphan?) vdr-mp3 (orphan/update ?) I own most of the vdr packages, however I don't use VDR any longer and thus have lost interest to maintain them. So I think orphaning them would be the best solution unless somebody else feels like tak

Re: [RPM Fusion] Current FTBFS in F-17 - take 2

2012-05-04 Thread Richard Shaw
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 9:36 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > 2012/5/4 Richard Shaw : >> On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 8:35 AM, Richard Shaw wrote: >>> On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 1:35 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: -- free -- avidemux ? >>> >>> Not sure what's up with avidemux. Built fine in mock for me.

Re: [RPM Fusion] Current FTBFS in F-17 - take 2

2012-05-04 Thread Nicolas Chauvet
2012/5/4 Richard Shaw : > On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 8:35 AM, Richard Shaw wrote: >> On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 1:35 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: >>> -- free -- >>> avidemux ? >> >> Not sure what's up with avidemux. Built fine in mock for me. Bumped >> the release and rebuilding... > > Build succeeded. Th

Re: [RPM Fusion] Current FTBFS in F-17 - take 2

2012-05-04 Thread Richard Shaw
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 8:35 AM, Richard Shaw wrote: > On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 1:35 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: >> -- free -- >> avidemux ? > > Not sure what's up with avidemux. Built fine in mock for me. Bumped > the release and rebuilding... Build succeeded. Richard

Re: [RPM Fusion] Current FTBFS in F-17 - take 2

2012-05-04 Thread Richard Shaw
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 1:35 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > -- free -- > avidemux ? Not sure what's up with avidemux. Built fine in mock for me. Bumped the release and rebuilding... Richard

Re: [RPM Fusion] Current FTBFS in F-17 - take 2

2012-05-04 Thread Rex Dieter
On 05/04/2012 01:35 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: kmediafactory KDE (Rex ?) update available 0.8.1 This should be fixed now, builds submitted -- rex

Re: [RPM Fusion] Current FTBFS in F-17 - take 2

2012-05-04 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Sex, 2012-05-04 at 08:35 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > 2012/5/1 Nicolas Chauvet : > > Hello, > . > Here is an updated package list, Hi, > -- free -- > avidemux ? avidemux is one FTBFS in F-17 ? > streamdvd (orphan ?) http://web.archive.org/web/20070406192432/http://www.badabum.de/stre

Re: [RPM Fusion] Current FTBFS in F-17 - take 2

2012-05-03 Thread Nicolas Chauvet
2012/5/1 Nicolas Chauvet : > Hello, . Here is an updated package list, > Here is  the current list of packages that Fail To Build From Sources > from the RPM Fusion 17 tree. > This is based on the dist tag from the development/17 repo. > > Some of them might be trivial like a version bump. It mean

Re: [RPM Fusion] Current FTBFS in F-17

2012-05-02 Thread Nicolas Chauvet
2012/5/2 Sérgio Basto : > On Qua, 2012-05-02 at 10:40 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: >> 2012/5/2 Sérgio Basto : >> > On Ter, 2012-05-01 at 20:23 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: >> >> mjpegtools >> > >> > needs a patch for gcc 4.7 >> > http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=3515859&gr

Re: [RPM Fusion] Current FTBFS in F-17

2012-05-02 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Qua, 2012-05-02 at 10:40 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > 2012/5/2 Sérgio Basto : > > On Ter, 2012-05-01 at 20:23 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > >> mjpegtools > > > > needs a patch for gcc 4.7 > > http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=3515859&group_id=5776&atid=305776 > > > >

Re: [RPM Fusion] Current FTBFS in F-17

2012-05-02 Thread Nicolas Chauvet
2012/5/2 Sérgio Basto : > On Ter, 2012-05-01 at 20:23 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: >> mjpegtools > > needs a patch for gcc 4.7 > http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=3515859&group_id=5776&atid=305776 > > http://sourceforge.net/tracker/download.php?group_id=5776&atid=305776&file

Re: [RPM Fusion] Current FTBFS in F-17

2012-05-02 Thread Nicolas Chauvet
2012/5/2 Andrea Musuruane : > On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 8:23 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: >> Hello, >> >> FYI. >> >> Here is  the current list of packages that Fail To Build From Sources >> from the RPM Fusion 17 tree. >> This is based on the dist tag from the development/17 repo. >> >> Some of them mi

Re: [RPM Fusion] Current FTBFS in F-17

2012-05-02 Thread Andrea Musuruane
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 8:23 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > Hello, > > FYI. > > Here is  the current list of packages that Fail To Build From Sources > from the RPM Fusion 17 tree. > This is based on the dist tag from the development/17 repo. > > Some of them might be trivial like a version bump. It

Re: [RPM Fusion] Current FTBFS in F-17

2012-05-01 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Ter, 2012-05-01 at 20:23 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > mjpegtools needs a patch for gcc 4.7 http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=3515859&group_id=5776&atid=305776 http://sourceforge.net/tracker/download.php?group_id=5776&atid=305776&file_id=440578&aid=3515859 send to you

Re: [RPM Fusion] Current FTBFS in F-17

2012-05-01 Thread Richard Shaw
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: > On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: >> Hello, >> >> FYI. >> >> Here is  the current list of packages that Fail To Build From Sources >> from the RPM Fusion 17 tree. >> This is based on the dist tag from the development/17 re

Re: [RPM Fusion] Current FTBFS in F-17

2012-05-01 Thread Richard Shaw
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > Hello, > > FYI. > > Here is  the current list of packages that Fail To Build From Sources > from the RPM Fusion 17 tree. > This is based on the dist tag from the development/17 repo. > > imagination I forgot about this since before the fork

[RPM Fusion] Current FTBFS in F-17

2012-05-01 Thread Nicolas Chauvet
Hello, FYI. Here is the current list of packages that Fail To Build From Sources from the RPM Fusion 17 tree. This is based on the dist tag from the development/17 repo. Some of them might be trivial like a version bump. It means the package more likely is in search for a new maintainer. Please