Re: [VirtualBox] Use systemd-detect-virt to detect if we can install

On Qui, 2016-12-22 at 18:24 +, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Qui, 2016-12-22 at 11:32 +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski > wrote: > > > > On Thursday, 22 December 2016 at 05:53, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > [...] > > > > > > > > > VirtualBox 5.1.12 is released , may I commit it in all branches , >

Re: [VirtualBox] Use systemd-detect-virt to detect if we can install

On Qui, 2016-12-22 at 11:32 +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > On Thursday, 22 December 2016 at 05:53, Sérgio Basto wrote: > [...] > > > > VirtualBox 5.1.12 is released , may I commit it in all branches , > > with > > this new  systemd-detect-virt or not ?  > Sorry, I don't have time t

Re: [VirtualBox] Use systemd-detect-virt to detect if we can install

On Thursday, 22 December 2016 at 05:53, Sérgio Basto wrote: [...] > VirtualBox 5.1.12 is released , may I commit it in all branches , with > this new  systemd-detect-virt or not ?  Sorry, I don't have time to look at this in detail before Christmas, maybe next week. Personally, I still think faili

Re: was -> wasn't Re: [VirtualBox] Use systemd-detect-virt to detect if we can install

On Ter, 2016-11-29 at 18:46 +, Sérgio Basto wrote: > Hi, > > On Ter, 2016-11-29 at 14:17 +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski > wrote: > > > > > > Hi Sérgio, > > could you explain the idea here? Why was there an explicit > > Conflicts: > > before and why is it better to fail the transaction

Re: was -> wasn't Re: [VirtualBox] Use systemd-detect-virt to detect if we can install

On Qua, 2016-11-30 at 23:11 +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > On Wednesday, 30 November 2016 at 22:10, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > > On Qua, 2016-11-30 at 21:22 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > > > > > > 2016-11-30 18:07 GMT+01:00 Sérgio Basto : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The

Re: was -> wasn't Re: [VirtualBox] Use systemd-detect-virt to detect if we can install

On Wednesday, 30 November 2016 at 22:10, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Qua, 2016-11-30 at 21:22 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > > 2016-11-30 18:07 GMT+01:00 Sérgio Basto : > > > > > > > > The only problem is "We should avoid installation of VirtualBox- > > > guest- > > > additions on bare metal",

Re: was -> wasn't Re: [VirtualBox] Use systemd-detect-virt to detect if we can install

On Qua, 2016-11-30 at 21:22 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > 2016-11-30 18:07 GMT+01:00 Sérgio Basto : > > > > > The only problem is "We should avoid installation of VirtualBox- > > guest- > > additions on bare metal", have you any suggestion that can improve > > this > > solution ? > You hav

Re: was -> wasn't Re: [VirtualBox] Use systemd-detect-virt to detect if we can install

2016-11-30 18:07 GMT+01:00 Sérgio Basto : > The only problem is "We should avoid installation of VirtualBox-guest- > additions on bare metal", have you any suggestion that can improve this > solution ? You have wrong premise. You want to avoid the "installation" to avoid the conflict where you

Re: was -> wasn't Re: [VirtualBox] Use systemd-detect-virt to detect if we can install

On Qua, 2016-11-30 at 15:26 +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > On Tuesday, 29 November 2016 at 22:39, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > > On Ter, 2016-11-29 at 22:16 +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski > > wrote: > > > > > > On Tuesday, 29 November 2016 at 19:46, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > >

Re: was -> wasn't Re: [VirtualBox] Use systemd-detect-virt to detect if we can install

On Tuesday, 29 November 2016 at 22:39, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Ter, 2016-11-29 at 22:16 +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski > wrote: > > On Tuesday, 29 November 2016 at 19:46, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > > > > On Ter, 2016-11-29 at 14:17 +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski > > > wrote: > > > >

Re: was -> wasn't Re: [VirtualBox] Use systemd-detect-virt to detect if we can install

On Ter, 2016-11-29 at 22:16 +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > On Tuesday, 29 November 2016 at 19:46, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > > On Ter, 2016-11-29 at 14:17 +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski > > wrote: > > > > > > could you explain the idea here? Why was there an explicit > > > C

Re: was -> wasn't Re: [VirtualBox] Use systemd-detect-virt to detect if we can install

On Tuesday, 29 November 2016 at 19:46, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Ter, 2016-11-29 at 14:17 +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski > wrote: > > could you explain the idea here? Why was there an explicit Conflicts: > > before and why is it better to fail the transaction if you're not > > running inside

Re: was -> wasn't Re: [VirtualBox] Use systemd-detect-virt to detect if we can install

On Ter, 2016-11-29 at 18:46 +, Sérgio Basto wrote: > Hi, > > On Ter, 2016-11-29 at 14:17 +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski > wrote: > > > > > > Hi Sérgio, > > could you explain the idea here? Why was there an explicit > > Conflicts: > > before and why is it better to fail the transaction

was -> wasn't Re: [VirtualBox] Use systemd-detect-virt to detect if we can install

Hi, On Ter, 2016-11-29 at 14:17 +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > > Hi Sérgio, > could you explain the idea here? Why was there an explicit Conflicts: > before and why is it better to fail the transaction if you're not > running inside VirtualBox or KVM? It is a long story, bug repor

Re: [VirtualBox] Use systemd-detect-virt to detect if we can install

Hi, On Ter, 2016-11-29 at 14:17 +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > Hi Sérgio, > could you explain the idea here? Why was there an explicit Conflicts: > before and why is it better to fail the transaction if you're not > running inside VirtualBox or KVM? It is a long story, bug reports

Re: [VirtualBox] Use systemd-detect-virt to detect if we can install

Hi Sérgio, could you explain the idea here? Why was there an explicit Conflicts: before and why is it better to fail the transaction if you're not running inside VirtualBox or KVM? Also, what if calling systemd-detect-virt fails for some reason? Regards, Dominik -- Fedora http://fedoraproject.org