As discussed on IRC, manual installation of the AppData packages should not be
necessary because the rpmfusion AppData packages should be built to supplement
the Fedora AppData packages. In other words, they should be installed
automatically on systems with Fedora AppData package already
On Mon, 2017-11-27 at 17:14 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> As you can see, this is the wrong fix, so we are waiting for the
> appropriate input so this document can be fixed appropriately.
>
> thx for your patience
+1
Can we please test if the "Supplements:" bit works, and then we can get
rid
2017-11-27 15:52 GMT+01:00 Daniel Rusek :
> Still not fixed.
As you can see, this is the wrong fix, so we are waiting for the
appropriate input so this document can be fixed appropriately.
thx for your patience
--
-
Nicolas (kwizart)
Still not fixed.
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
On Fri, 2017-11-24 at 21:42 +, Daniel Rusek wrote:
> Can someone please fix it? Thanks!
Did you have a chance to check if the RPMFusion appdata is pulled in if
Fedora appdata is already installed? That would remove the requirement
for any manual intervention (and the info on wiki pages) and
The second point (Configuration page) seems to be fixed. Regarding the first
point (download links), as noted in my bug report comment:
The current AppStream metadata download links are not working, because the
Fedora 26 free link is missing a ".fc26" part, the Fedora 26 non free link has
On Thu, 2017-11-23 at 15:38 +, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-11-23 at 14:40 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > Please contact the author of this page FrancisoD
>
> Is that page also protected? I was hoping anyone could edit it rather
> than waiting for me. :/
no, just need to know the
On Thu, 2017-11-23 at 13:41 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> I haven't started a new installation from scratch recently, but when
> I've checked, the rpmfusion appdata package had a Supplements:
> appdata, so they should be installed when the (fedora) appdata
> package
> is already installed.
>
>
On Thu, 2017-11-23 at 14:40 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> Please contact the author of this page FrancisoD
Is that page also protected? I was hoping anyone could edit it rather
than waiting for me. :/
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD"
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
On Thu, 2017-11-23 at 12:28 +, Daniel Rusek wrote:
> Hello,
>
> this mailing list post is a continuation of the discussion in: https:
> //bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4703
>
> There is now a wiki page with links to the AppStream metadata
> packages to allow regular users to install
2017-11-23 13:28 GMT+01:00 Daniel Rusek :
> Hello,
>
> this mailing list post is a continuation of the discussion in:
> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4703
Hello and thx for rising the issue.
> There is now a wiki page with links to the AppStream metadata
Hello,
this mailing list post is a continuation of the discussion in:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4703
There is now a wiki page with links to the AppStream metadata packages to allow
regular users to install RPM Fusion packages via GUI, however there are still
some issues:
12 matches
Mail list logo