On 09.01.2009 13:57, Matthias Saou wrote:
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote :
We never discussed this: Will we EOL RPM Fusion for Fedora foo if in
parallel with the EOL of Fedora foo?
I'd say we definitely should do that, which would mean that we EOL RPM
Fusion for F8 now.
More info: Livna in the past E
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote :
> We never discussed this: Will we EOL RPM Fusion for Fedora foo if in
> parallel with the EOL of Fedora foo?
>
> I'd say we definitely should do that, which would mean that we EOL RPM
> Fusion for F8 now.
>
> More info: Livna in the past EOLed support for a Fedora re
On Thursday 08 January 2009 10:30:48 am Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> Hi!
>
> We never discussed this: Will we EOL RPM Fusion for Fedora foo if in
> parallel with the EOL of Fedora foo?
+1.
> I'd say we definitely should do that, which would mean that we EOL RPM
> Fusion for F8 now.
Agreed.
>
> Mor
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 7:30 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> I'd say we definitely should do that, which would mean that we EOL RPM
> Fusion for F8 now.
I agree.
> More info: Livna in the past EOLed support for a Fedora release when that
> went EOL -- that worked fine afaics. Does anybody know how
Hi!
We never discussed this: Will we EOL RPM Fusion for Fedora foo if in
parallel with the EOL of Fedora foo?
I'd say we definitely should do that, which would mean that we EOL RPM
Fusion for F8 now.
More info: Livna in the past EOLed support for a Fedora release when
that went EOL -- that
