Julian Sikorski wrote:
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FTBFS says:
> Packages with unresolved FTBFS bugs immediately following the Alpha
> release
... which would be F12 Alpha...
> I'd say we should follow the policy and drop these packages for now,
> they can be re-added at later date.
... so n
Thorsten Leemhuis pisze:
> On 26.04.2009 14:13, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>> On 12.04.2009 14:43, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>>> On 31.03.2009 08:01, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
The massrebuild finished here is a list of packages that failed:
>>> A lot of rebuild problems have been fixed,
>> And som
On 26.04.2009 14:13, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
On 12.04.2009 14:43, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
On 31.03.2009 08:01, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
The massrebuild finished here is a list of packages that failed:
A lot of rebuild problems have been fixed,
And some more have have been fixed over the pas
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 11:27 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis
wrote:
>>> Here is a list of packages that sill haven't been rebuild:
Adding maintainers below.
>> 502 2009-04-07 2009-04-07 snes9x matthias...rpmforge.net
>> 503 2009-04-07 2009-04-07 raine lxtnow...gma
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 5:27 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> (trying with a different topic)
>
> On 26.04.2009 14:13, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>>
>> On 12.04.2009 14:43, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>>>
>>> On 31.03.2009 08:01, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>
>> [...]
>>>
>>> Here is a list of packages that
(trying with a different topic)
On 26.04.2009 14:13, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
On 12.04.2009 14:43, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
On 31.03.2009 08:01, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> [...]
Here is a list of packages that sill haven't been rebuild:
502 2009-04-07 2009-04-07 snes9x
503
On 12.04.2009 14:43, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
On 31.03.2009 08:01, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
The massrebuild finished here is a list of packages that failed:
A lot of rebuild problems have been fixed,
And some more have have been fixed over the past few days :-)
but there are still some to g
On 31.03.2009 08:01, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
The massrebuild finished here is a list of packages that failed:
A lot of rebuild problems have been fixed, but there are still some to
go. Here is a list of packages that sill haven't been rebuild:
# opened changed compone
On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 4:23 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> That was a hickup that was fixed by a requeuing the job. Part of the problem
> might have been that the local rawhide tree was updated in the middle of the
> build process.
Thanks Thorsten for re-queuing it.
Andrea.
On 04.04.2009 15:52, Andrea Musuruane wrote:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 8:01 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
The massrebuild finished here is a list of packages that failed:
gambatte-0_4_1-2_fc11 on
http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_free/3217-gambatte-0.4.1-2.fc11/ppc
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 8:01 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> Hi!
>
> The massrebuild finished here is a list of packages that failed:
>
> gambatte-0_4_1-2_fc11 on
> http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_free/3217-gambatte-0.4.1-2.fc11/ppc
I fixed this in CVS, but the bui
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> Fixed, not kmediafactory fails differently:
>
> http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_free/3233-kmediafactory-0.7.0-0.3.rc2.fc11/x86_64/build.log
>
>> /usr/bin/ld: Dwarf Error: Offset (132296) greater than or equal to
>> .debug_str size (91833)
On 03/31/2009 08:01 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
Hi!
wormsofprey-0_4_3-4_fc11 on
http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_free/3315-wormsofprey-0.4.3-4.fc11/x86_64
Fixed.
vice-2_1-2_fc11 on
http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_nonfree/3382-v
On 31.03.2009 20:02, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
[...]
kmediafactory-0_7_0-0_3_rc2_fc11 on
http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_free/3233-kmediafactory-0.7.0-0.3.rc2.fc11/ppc
The correct logs are actually here:
Sorry, I did a rebuild after my po
On 31.03.2009 10:14, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
On 31.03.2009 09:23, Michael Schwendt wrote:
The little bit longer version: Some of our plague servers and builders
are not fully up to date. Some (e.g. the newest one) are not configured
properly (private buildsys repos are not enabled) as I justed
On 31.03.2009 11:38, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 10:14:20 +0200, Thorsten wrote:
In short: Our infra sucks.
Well, "infra" consists of multiple things:
I in the mail ýou replied to I mainly meant the RPM Fusion counterpart
to "Fedora infrastructure", e.g.
- the available
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> k9copy-2_3_0-2_fc11 on
>
> http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_free/3231-k9copy-2.3.0-2.fc11/ppc
This one is missing #include or #include in
k9tools.cpp.
> kmediafactory-0_7_0-0_3_rc2_fc11 on
>
> http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fed
On 31.03.2009 18:58, Steven Moix wrote:
On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 08:01 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
motion-3_2_11-4_fc11 on
http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_free/3261-motion-3.2.11-4.fc11/ppc
That's a bug which should be corrected in motion's next version, coming
On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 08:01 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> motion-3_2_11-4_fc11 on
>
> http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_free/3261-motion-3.2.11-4.fc11/ppc
That's a bug which should be corrected in motion's next version, coming
out in a couple of days. Until then,
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 10:14:20 +0200, Thorsten wrote:
> In short: Our infra sucks.
Well, "infra" consists of multiple things:
- the available hardware resources
- the available human resources
- the organisational model that is being used
(e.g. meetings, agenda, task offers, recruiting of vol
On 31.03.2009 09:23, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 08:16:04 +0200, Julian wrote:
bsnes looks like a buildsystem hiccup. Could you please requeue?
Indeed it looks much like the very old race-condition (which had been fixed
in Fedora/EPEL Plague) under which successful build result
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 08:16:04 +0200, Julian wrote:
> bsnes looks like a buildsystem hiccup. Could you please requeue?
>
> Julian
>
Indeed it looks much like the very old race-condition (which had been fixed
in Fedora/EPEL Plague) under which successful build results are copied more
than once and
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 2:01 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> Hi!
>
> The massrebuild finished here is a list of packages that failed:
>
> avbin-7-8_fc11 on
> http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_free/3187-avbin-7-8.fc11/ppc
>
Just for the record, this one is rebuilt with
On 31.03.2009 08:39, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
On 31.03.2009 08:16, Julian Sikorski wrote:
> [...]
/me wonders if I should requeue all the failed jobs once in case there
were more hiccups (I suspect there are)
I requeued a few that looked suspect.
CU
knurd
On 31.03.2009 08:16, Julian Sikorski wrote:
> [...]
bsnes looks like a buildsystem hiccup. Could you please requeue?
Done.
/me wonders if I should requeue all the failed jobs once in case there
were more hiccups (I suspect there are)
CU
knurd
Thorsten Leemhuis pisze:
> Hi!
>
> The massrebuild finished here is a list of packages that failed:
>
> avbin-7-8_fc11 on
>
> http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_free/3187-avbin-7-8.fc11/ppc
>
>
> avidemux-2_4_4-5_fc11 on
>
> http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fe
Hi!
The massrebuild finished here is a list of packages that failed:
avbin-7-8_fc11 on
http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_free/3187-avbin-7-8.fc11/ppc
avidemux-2_4_4-5_fc11 on
http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_free/3188-avidemux-2.4
27 matches
Mail list logo
