On Wed, 2013-05-15 at 16:55 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
Hi,
Please note that despite the shared object is named opencv_nonfree.so,
this library will belong to the RPM Fusion free section.
We used to use the opencv-freeworld as the package name in this case.
(instead of opencv-free).
2013/5/9 Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com
Hi Hans, Alec,
On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 11:23 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
Note that we would prefer for opencv-nonfree to just contain a couple
of plugins, or some such, and depend on the Fedora package. If that is
not possible it is allowed to
Hi folks,
I recently realized that the opencv module in Fedora doesn't contain the
nonfree parts, which are the SURF and SIFT feature detectors. I was
wondering if it's OK to make them available via RPMFusion? Both SIFT and
SURF are widely used feature detectors in vision research. Not having
here to submit an opencv-nonfree package to rpmfusion:
http://rpmfusion.org/Contributors#Submitting_a_new_package
Once you've done that you may want to send a mail to this list asking
for a review swap, otherwise it may take quite long to get a review
done.
Note that we would prefer for opencv
On 2013-05-08 09:54, Ankur Sinha wrote:
Hi folks,
I recently realized that the opencv module in Fedora doesn't contain the
nonfree parts, which are the SURF and SIFT feature detectors. I was
wondering if it's OK to make them available via RPMFusion? Both SIFT and
SURF are widely used feature
Hi Hans, Alec,
On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 11:23 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
Note that we would prefer for opencv-nonfree to just contain a couple
of plugins, or some such, and depend on the Fedora package. If that is
not possible it is allowed to simply copy the Fedora package as base,
add the
