On Dom, 2013-12-15 at 22:23 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> 2013/12/15 Miro Hrončok
> What is the plan for F20 at all? This is my first Fedora
> release when I have package in rpmfusion, so I have no idea.
> Still see only F-18, F-19 and devel in cvs.
>
> We should have be
Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> We should have been branched along with fedora, but in the f20 case, we
> are rather late if we ever branch at all in cvs. In others words, I would
> prefer to amputate some time for the f21 development and work more on a
> koji migration than to still continue with cvs.
I
For the mpv case, and given that I will still need to build few
packages for the release, I can either delete the build for f20 or put
it directly in the release Everything repo, replacing the previous
package.
Do whatever you prefer, I've resolved two bug reports, so I thing it's
a good idea t
2013/12/15 Miro Hrončok
> What is the plan for F20 at all? This is my first Fedora release when I
> have package in rpmfusion, so I have no idea. Still see only F-18, F-19 and
> devel in cvs.
>
We should have been branched along with fedora, but in the f20 case, we are
rather late if we ever bran
What is the plan for F20 at all? This is my first Fedora release when I
have package in rpmfusion, so I have no idea. Still see only F-18, F-19
and devel in cvs.
Thanks
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
On Dom, 2013-12-08 at 10:46 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> We are supposed to be frozen in order to prepare the RPM Fusion
> release.
> Still I would like the nvidia driver to be updated to the latest
> There is also rpmfusion-*-release to update and the related mock* and
> spin ch
Hello,
We are supposed to be frozen in order to prepare the RPM Fusion release.
Still I would like the nvidia driver to be updated to the latest
There is also rpmfusion-*-release to update and the related mock* and spin
changes...
Anyone still see any blocker bug beyound this one related to the m
