Re: What is missing for f23 readyness ?

On Seg, 2015-11-09 at 22:42 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > > > 2015-11-07 20:45 GMT+01:00 Sérgio Basto : > On Sáb, 2015-11-07 at 12:07 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > > I would like theses two tasks to be picked by others. > > > > > > >

Re: What is missing for f23 readyness ?

2015-11-09 22:45 GMT+01:00 Sérgio Basto : > On Seg, 2015-11-09 at 22:42 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > ... > > Ok, and what need to be done to have it ? > > https://github.com/rpmfusion-infra/mock-rpmfusion > > > Do you want that I fork and update it ? > Less question and

Re: What is missing for f23 readyness ?

2015-11-07 20:45 GMT+01:00 Sérgio Basto : > On Sáb, 2015-11-07 at 12:07 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > > I would like theses two tasks to be picked by others. > > > > > > > > There is a number of packages that need to be rebuilt as they wasn't > > updated for f23 "mass

Re: What is missing for f23 readyness ?

2015-11-07 15:12 GMT+01:00 Richard Shaw : > On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 5:07 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > >> There is a number of packages that need to be rebuilt as they wasn't >> updated for f23 "mass rebuilt" specially because of c++ ABI changes. If >>

Re: What is missing for f23 readyness ?

2015-11-07 18:20 GMT+01:00 Sérgio Basto : > On Sáb, 2015-11-07 at 15:05 +, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > On Sáb, 2015-11-07 at 08:12 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote: > > > On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 5:07 AM, Nicolas Chauvet > > > wrote: > > > There is a number

Re: What is missing for f23 readyness ?

2015-11-09 11:12 GMT+01:00 Karel Volný : > > Hi, > > while at it, can someone please update http://rpmfusion.org/Contributors > with links to git, or where the new work should be done? > It should be available once the rfpkg tool comes up into the repos, Please do not pulblish

Re: What is missing for f23 readyness ?

Hi, while at it, can someone please update http://rpmfusion.org/Contributors with links to git, or where the new work should be done? K. -- Karel Volný QE BaseOs/Daemons Team Red Hat Czech, Brno tel. +420 532294274 (RH: +420 532294111 ext. 8262074) xmpp ka...@jabber.cz :: "Never attribute

Re: What is missing for f23 readyness ?

Hi, Dne sobota 7. listopadu 2015 18:20:59 CET, Sérgio Basto napsal(a): 4 - packages without fc22 or fc23 tag: cat listall.txt | grep -vP "fc22|fc23" Only ufoai-data-2.4-1 and ufoai-data-server-2.4-1 note that there is new upstream version which should go to Fedora as the license issues

Re: What is missing for f23 readyness ?

Hi, On 08-11-15 16:34, Sérgio Basto wrote: Hi, On Dom, 2015-11-08 at 15:17 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: Hi, On 07-11-15 18:20, Sérgio Basto wrote: On Sáb, 2015-11-07 at 15:05 +, Sérgio Basto wrote: On Sáb, 2015-11-07 at 08:12 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote: On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 5:07 AM,

Re: What is missing for f23 readyness ?

Hi, On Dom, 2015-11-08 at 15:17 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 07-11-15 18:20, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > On Sáb, 2015-11-07 at 15:05 +, Sérgio Basto wrote: > >> On Sáb, 2015-11-07 at 08:12 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote: > >>> On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 5:07 AM, Nicolas Chauvet

Re: What is missing for f23 readyness ?

Hi, On 07-11-15 18:20, Sérgio Basto wrote: On Sáb, 2015-11-07 at 15:05 +, Sérgio Basto wrote: On Sáb, 2015-11-07 at 08:12 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote: On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 5:07 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: There is a number of packages that need to be rebuilt as

Re: What is missing for f23 readyness - provenpackagers list ?

On 07/11/15 22:07, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > Best would be to make a general review of missing updates. Audacity-freeworld is mine. The most recent release 2.1.1 is in f22 updates, but it appears only 2.0.6 is in F23 -free. I've bee building git alpha audacity on Fedora COPR, but it's still some

Re: What is missing for f23 readyness ?

On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 5:07 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > There is a number of packages that need to be rebuilt as they wasn't > updated for f23 "mass rebuilt" specially because of c++ ABI changes. If > someone can bring me a list I will submit them for rebuild next week. > I

Re: What is missing for f23 readyness ?

On Sáb, 2015-11-07 at 08:12 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote: > On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 5:07 AM, Nicolas Chauvet > wrote: > There is a number of packages that need to be rebuilt as they > wasn't updated for f23 "mass rebuilt" specially because of c++ > ABI

What is missing for f23 readyness ?

I would like theses two tasks to be picked by others. There is a number of packages that need to be rebuilt as they wasn't updated for f23 "mass rebuilt" specially because of c++ ABI changes. If someone can bring me a list I will submit them for rebuild next week. Also few packages and libraries

Re: What is missing for f23 readyness ?

On Sáb, 2015-11-07 at 12:07 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > I would like theses two tasks to be picked by others. > > > > There is a number of packages that need to be rebuilt as they wasn't > updated for f23 "mass rebuilt" specially because of c++ ABI changes. > If someone can bring me a list

Re: What is missing for f23 readyness ?

On Sáb, 2015-11-07 at 15:05 +, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Sáb, 2015-11-07 at 08:12 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 5:07 AM, Nicolas Chauvet > > wrote: > > There is a number of packages that need to be rebuilt as they > > wasn't updated