Re: qtractor moved to Fedora

On 05/24/2012 12:25 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: 2012/5/23 Brendan Jones: On 05/21/2012 09:50 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: Le 20 mai 2012 23:24, "Kevin Kofler"mailto:kevin.kof...@chello.at>> a écrit : Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > But in this case I wonder why not to simply override the no

Re: qtractor moved to Fedora

On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 3:50 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > Le 20 mai 2012 23:24, "Kevin Kofler" a écrit : > >> Nicolas Chauvet wrote: >> > But in this case I wonder why not to simply override the no >> > replacement policy ? At least a good reason would need to be provided >> > for still obeying thi

Re: qtractor moved to Fedora

2012/5/23 Brendan Jones : > On 05/21/2012 09:50 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: >> >> Le 20 mai 2012 23:24, "Kevin Kofler" > > a écrit : >> >> >>    Nicolas Chauvet wrote: >>     > But in this case I wonder why not to simply override the no >>     > replacement policy ? At

Re: qtractor moved to Fedora

On 05/21/2012 09:50 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: Le 20 mai 2012 23:24, "Kevin Kofler" mailto:kevin.kof...@chello.at>> a écrit : Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > But in this case I wonder why not to simply override the no > replacement policy ? At least a good reason would need to be provided

Re: qtractor moved to Fedora

Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > It doens't hold, RPM Fusion free is fully made of patent encumbered > components by design. No, not fully. For example, it also holds kernel modules under Free Software (normally GPLv2-compatible) licenses, which are not allowed in Fedora because of the special rule agai

Re: qtractor moved to Fedora

Le 20 mai 2012 23:24, "Kevin Kofler" a écrit : > Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > > But in this case I wonder why not to simply override the no > > replacement policy ? At least a good reason would need to be provided > > for still obeying this policy. > > Users in countries which obey software patents m

Re: qtractor moved to Fedora

Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > But in this case I wonder why not to simply override the no > replacement policy ? At least a good reason would need to be provided > for still obeying this policy. Users in countries which obey software patents might not want their patent- compliant package silently repla

Re: qtractor moved to Fedora

On 05/18/2012 12:11 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: 2012/5/18 Brendan Jones: ... The reason why we repackaged this in Fedora is so that we can include it in the upcoming Fedora Audio spin. This is the worse excuse that I ever heard. You will face your users complain not having mp3 support alone. If

Re: qtractor moved to Fedora

2012/5/18 Brendan Jones : ... > The reason why we repackaged this in Fedora is so that we can include it in > the upcoming Fedora Audio spin. This is the worse excuse that I ever heard. You will face your users complain not having mp3 support alone. If I was oget, I would have asked to purge the wh

Re: qtractor moved to Fedora

2012/5/18 Hans de Goede : .. Hmm, so you're suggesting to simply have an identical named package in both repos and have the one with the higher EVR win? That is just asking for trouble. I think (if you're right about there being just one binary) that you're alternatives plan is

Re: qtractor moved to Fedora

Hi, On 05/18/2012 11:38 AM, Brendan Jones wrote: On 05/18/2012 03:14 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: Hi, On 05/17/2012 06:13 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: 2012/5/16 Orcan Ogetbil: qtractor is now in Fedora, of course without the libmad support.

Re: qtractor moved to Fedora

On 05/18/2012 03:14 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: Hi, On 05/17/2012 06:13 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: 2012/5/16 Orcan Ogetbil: qtractor is now in Fedora, of course without the libmad support. Brendan Jones prepared a libmad-freeworld package

Re: qtractor moved to Fedora

On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > > On 05/17/2012 06:13 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: >> >> 2012/5/16 Orcan Ogetbil: >>> >>> qtractor is now in Fedora, of course without the libmad support. >>> Brendan Jones prepared a libmad-freeworld package with the libmad >>> support.

Re: qtractor moved to Fedora

Hi, On 05/17/2012 06:13 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: 2012/5/16 Orcan Ogetbil: qtractor is now in Fedora, of course without the libmad support. Brendan Jones prepared a libmad-freeworld package with the libmad support. This package is analogous to audacity-freeworld as it conflicts with the Fedora

Re: qtractor moved to Fedora

2012/5/16 Orcan Ogetbil : > qtractor is now in Fedora, of course without the libmad support. > Brendan Jones prepared a libmad-freeworld package with the libmad > support. This package is analogous to audacity-freeworld as it > conflicts with the Fedora counterpart since the libmad support is not >

Re: qtractor moved to Fedora

On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 5:43 AM, Brendan Jones wrote: > On 05/16/2012 06:47 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: >> >> qtractor is now in Fedora, of course without the libmad support. >> Brendan Jones prepared a libmad-freeworld package with the libmad > > > I think you meant qtractor-freeworld > Yes, of cour

Re: qtractor moved to Fedora

On 05/16/2012 06:47 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: qtractor is now in Fedora, of course without the libmad support. Brendan Jones prepared a libmad-freeworld package with the libmad I think you meant qtractor-freeworld support. This package is analogous to audacity-freeworld as it conflicts with th

qtractor moved to Fedora

qtractor is now in Fedora, of course without the libmad support. Brendan Jones prepared a libmad-freeworld package with the libmad support. This package is analogous to audacity-freeworld as it conflicts with the Fedora counterpart since the libmad support is not modular. Do we have a standard pro