Re: Updated (20080914): quite a few packages are still missing in the repos - dtimms' packages.

2008-09-23 Thread David Timms
Andrea Musuruane wrote: 2008/9/23 Thorsten Leemhuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: I can manually put nes-ntsc into the private "buildsys-repo" if needed. That repo is configured on each of the RPM Fusion builders, but normally empty and prepared for use-cases like this. But I would prefer to not spend my

Re: Updated (20080914): quite a few packages are still missing in the repos - dtimms' packages.

2008-09-23 Thread Andrea Musuruane
2008/9/23 Thorsten Leemhuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I can manually put nes-ntsc into the private "buildsys-repo" if needed. That > repo is configured on each of the RPM Fusion builders, but normally empty > and prepared for use-cases like this. But I would prefer to not spend my > time with things l

Re: Updated (20080914): quite a few packages are still missing in the repos - dtimms' packages.

2008-09-23 Thread Thorsten Leemhuis
On 23.09.2008 10:21, Andrea Musuruane wrote: 2008/9/23 David Timms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: dtimms [AT] iinet.net.au | nes-ntsc not found in free-devel dtimms [AT] iinet.net.au | nes-ntsc not found in free-F-8 dtimms [AT] iinet.net.au | nes-ntsc not found in free-F-9 now in fedora dtimms [AT] iin

Re: Updated (20080914): quite a few packages are still missing in the repos - dtimms' packages.

2008-09-23 Thread Andrea Musuruane
2008/9/23 David Timms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> dtimms [AT] iinet.net.au | nes-ntsc not found in free-devel >> dtimms [AT] iinet.net.au | nes-ntsc not found in free-F-8 >> dtimms [AT] iinet.net.au | nes-ntsc not found in free-F-9 > > now in fedora > >> dtimms [AT] iinet.net.au | smc-ntsc not found in

Re: Updated (20080914): quite a few packages are still missing in the repos - dtimms' packages.

2008-09-22 Thread David Timms
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: dtimms [AT] iinet.net.au | gcube not found in free-devel dtimms [AT] iinet.net.au | gcube not found in free-F-8 dtimms [AT] iinet.net.au | gcube not found in free-F-9 I've had successful builds of these now. dtimms [AT] iinet.net.au | madplay not found in free-devel dt

Re: quite a few packages are still missing in the repos :-(

2008-09-20 Thread Julian Sikorski
Thorsten Leemhuis pisze: > On 20.09.2008 16:12, Julian Sikorski wrote: >> Thorsten Leemhuis pisze: >>> I just did a rough check which packages are branched in CVS, but afaics >>> not yet build for either F-8, F-9 or devel; see below for a full list >>> (scroll down for a list of packages sorted by

Re: quite a few packages are still missing in the repos :-(

2008-09-20 Thread Thorsten Leemhuis
On 20.09.2008 16:12, Julian Sikorski wrote: Thorsten Leemhuis pisze: I just did a rough check which packages are branched in CVS, but afaics not yet build for either F-8, F-9 or devel; see below for a full list (scroll down for a list of packages sorted by email of its owner). If one of your pa

Re: quite a few packages are still missing in the repos :-(

2008-09-20 Thread Julian Sikorski
Thorsten Leemhuis pisze: > Hi all! > > I just did a rough check which packages are branched in CVS, but afaics > not yet build for either F-8, F-9 or devel; see below for a full list > (scroll down for a list of packages sorted by email of its owner). > > If one of your packages is in this list p

Updated (20080914): quite a few packages are still missing in the repos :-(

2008-09-14 Thread Thorsten Leemhuis
Hi! /me again! On 03.09.2008 19:06, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: I just did a rough check which packages are branched in CVS, but afaics not yet build for either F-8, F-9 or devel; see below for a full list (scroll down for a list of packages sorted by email of its owner). If one of your package

Re: quite a few packages are still missing in the repos :-(

2008-09-14 Thread Thorsten Leemhuis
On 06.09.2008 20:03, David Woodhouse wrote: On Sat, 2008-09-06 at 15:15 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: On 06.09.2008 12:00, Hans de Goede wrote: > I have no objections to temporarily using ExcludeArch ppc*, I don't like it very much -- it's quite easy to forget fixing ppc and reverting the E

Re: quite a few packages are still missing in the repos :-(

2008-09-08 Thread David Timms
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: If one of your packages is in this list please take care of it or tell me what's wrong. tia! = free repo = gcube madplay In all the excitement of just getting modules created, branched and permissions sorted, I only got around to importing these two, not yet made the

Re: quite a few packages are still missing in the repos :-( *ntsc's

2008-09-08 Thread David Timms
Hans de Goede wrote: nes-ntsc snes-ntsc These 2 are moving to Fedora AFAIK (moving them to Fedora has been approved by Spot, I can do a very fast review of them one someone submits them). Hans: my ears pricked up when you said that... if you still have time, the first package review request

Re: quite a few packages are still missing in the repos :-(

2008-09-07 Thread Denis Leroy
Hans de Goede wrote: Actually (I need to write a blog post about this and let the world) Sept 1st I've started working for RH on the installer team, congratulations!

Re: quite a few packages are still missing in the repos :-(

2008-09-07 Thread Hans de Goede
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: On 07.09.2008 09:46, Hans de Goede wrote: Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: On 03.09.2008 19:35, Hans de Goede wrote: Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: == packages with owners == whoa those are not mine, they are all dribble packages which used to be maintained by Ian Chapman, who i

Re: quite a few packages are still missing in the repos :-(

2008-09-07 Thread Thorsten Leemhuis
On 07.09.2008 09:46, Hans de Goede wrote: Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: On 03.09.2008 19:35, Hans de Goede wrote: Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: == packages with owners == whoa those are not mine, they are all dribble packages which used to be maintained by Ian Chapman, who is currently emigrating to

Re: quite a few packages are still missing in the repos :-(

2008-09-07 Thread Hans de Goede
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: On 03.09.2008 19:35, Hans de Goede wrote: Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: == packages with owners == whoa those are not mine, they are all dribble packages which used to be maintained by Ian Chapman, who is currently emigrating to Australia, it would be good to keep them a

Re: quite a few packages are still missing in the repos :-(

2008-09-06 Thread David Woodhouse
On Sat, 2008-09-06 at 15:15 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > On 06.09.2008 12:00, Hans de Goede wrote: > > Stewart Adam wrote: > >> Avidemux has a ppc build error that's been bugging me... If you don't > >> mind, I'd like to excludearch ppc{,64} for now just to get it initially > >> into the rpmfu

Re: quite a few packages are still missing in the repos :-(

2008-09-06 Thread Thorsten Leemhuis
On 03.09.2008 19:35, Hans de Goede wrote: Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: == packages with owners == whoa those are not mine, they are all dribble packages which used to be maintained by Ian Chapman, who is currently emigrating to Australia, it would be good to keep them around as he may pick them

Re: quite a few packages are still missing in the repos :-(

2008-09-06 Thread Thorsten Leemhuis
On 06.09.2008 12:00, Hans de Goede wrote: Stewart Adam wrote: Avidemux has a ppc build error that's been bugging me... If you don't mind, I'd like to excludearch ppc{,64} for now just to get it initially into the rpmfusion repositories, then I'll do some more searching for a fix. I don't have a

Re: quite a few packages are still missing in the repos :-(

2008-09-06 Thread Hans de Goede
Stewart Adam wrote: Avidemux has a ppc build error that's been bugging me... If you don't mind, I'd like to excludearch ppc{,64} for now just to get it initially into the rpmfusion repositories, then I'll do some more searching for a fix. I don't have a ppc machine to test with so I it's my only

Re: quite a few packages are still missing in the repos :-(

2008-09-05 Thread Stewart Adam
Avidemux has a ppc build error that's been bugging me... If you don't mind, I'd like to excludearch ppc{,64} for now just to get it initially into the rpmfusion repositories, then I'll do some more searching for a fix. I don't have a ppc machine to test with so I it's my only strategy is basically

Re: quite a few packages are still missing in the repos :-(

2008-09-05 Thread Hans de Goede
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: On 05.09.2008 14:34, Hans de Goede wrote: Andrea Musuruane wrote: 2008/9/5 Thorsten Leemhuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: [...] libmss -- no owner known [...] Does anybody have any idea where this package comes from and who takes care of it? All I found was It seems Hans: h

Re: quite a few packages are still missing in the repos :-(

2008-09-05 Thread Thorsten Leemhuis
On 05.09.2008 14:34, Hans de Goede wrote: Andrea Musuruane wrote: 2008/9/5 Thorsten Leemhuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: [...] libmss -- no owner known [...] Does anybody have any idea where this package comes from and who takes care of it? All I found was It seems Hans: http://rpmfusion.org/Initial

Re: quite a few packages are still missing in the repos :-(

2008-09-05 Thread Hans de Goede
Andrea Musuruane wrote: 2008/9/5 Thorsten Leemhuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: [...] libmss -- no owner known [...] Does anybody have any idea where this package comes from and who takes care of it? All I found was It seems Hans: http://rpmfusion.org/InitialPackageMerge?action=recall&rev=67 Corre

Re: quite a few packages are still missing in the repos :-(

2008-09-05 Thread Andrea Musuruane
2008/9/5 Thorsten Leemhuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> [...] libmss -- no owner known >> [...] > > Does anybody have any idea where this package comes from and who takes care > of it? All I found was It seems Hans: http://rpmfusion.org/InitialPackageMerge?action=recall&rev=67 Bye, Andrea.

Re: quite a few packages are still missing in the repos :-(

2008-09-05 Thread Thorsten Leemhuis
On 03.09.2008 19:06, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: I just did a rough check which packages are branched in CVS, but afaics not yet build for either F-8, F-9 or devel; see below for a full list (scroll down for a list of packages sorted by email of its owner). If one of your packages is in this list

Re: quite a few packages are still missing in the repos :-(

2008-09-04 Thread Karel Volný
> > kvolny at redhat.com qmmp-plugins-freeworld > > I'm not sure he is on the rpmfusion list, he usually does a > good job, somebody should ping him. I am, but I am not that fast as the others, usually ;-) the problem with qmmp-plugins-freeworld lies in the updated ffmpeg headers ... since it

Re: quite a few packages are still missing in the repos :-(

2008-09-04 Thread Xavier Lamien
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 10:56 AM, Andrea Musuruane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > 2008/9/3 Andrea Musuruane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> musuruan at gmail.com e-uae > > > > Working on it. SELinux issues. > > BTW, even if I solve these, we'll be unable to build it because of > missing BR: libcapsimage-dev

Re: quite a few packages are still missing in the repos :-(

2008-09-04 Thread Andrea Musuruane
2008/9/3 Andrea Musuruane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> musuruan at gmail.com e-uae > > Working on it. SELinux issues. BTW, even if I solve these, we'll be unable to build it because of missing BR: libcapsimage-devel. Bye, Andrea.

Re: quite a few packages are still missing in the repos :-(

2008-09-03 Thread Marc Bradshaw
Andrea Musuruane wrote: >>> j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl doc >>> > MarcBradshaw > http://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/2008-August/000823.html > http://rpmfusion.org/InitialPackageMerge > > > >>> j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl sl >>> > MarcBradshaw > http://lists.rpmfusio

Re: quite a few packages are still missing in the repos :-(

2008-09-03 Thread Sebastian Vahl
Am Mittwoch, 3. September 2008 schrieb Thorsten Leemhuis: > Hi all! > > kmediafactory I've built it for devel a few minutes ago (build id: 720). Tomorrow I'll test which version I use for F-8/F-9 (there's been some build and runtime issues in the past). Sebastian signature.asc Description: Th

Re: quite a few packages are still missing in the repos :-(

2008-09-03 Thread Andrea Musuruane
2008/9/3 Hans de Goede <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> nes-ntsc >> snes-ntsc > > These 2 are moving to Fedora AFAIK (moving them to Fedora has been approved > by Spot, I can do a very fast review of them one someone submits them). nes-ntsc review is BZ #458085 :) David Timms asked to maitaint all *-ntsc p

Re: quite a few packages are still missing in the repos :-(

2008-09-03 Thread Andrea Musuruane
2008/9/3 Thorsten Leemhuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > musuruan at gmail.com Nestopia Nestopia misses nes_ntsc-devel BR. > musuruan at gmail.com e-uae Working on it. SELinux issues. Bye, Andrea.

Re: quite a few packages are still missing in the repos :-(

2008-09-03 Thread Hans de Goede
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: Hi all! I just did a rough check which packages are branched in CVS, but afaics not yet build for either F-8, F-9 or devel; see below for a full list (scroll down for a list of packages sorted by email of its owner). If one of your packages is in this list please tak

quite a few packages are still missing in the repos :-(

2008-09-03 Thread Thorsten Leemhuis
Hi all! I just did a rough check which packages are branched in CVS, but afaics not yet build for either F-8, F-9 or devel; see below for a full list (scroll down for a list of packages sorted by email of its owner). If one of your packages is in this list please take care of it or tell me w