On Sun, 15 Feb 2009 13:12:30 +0100, Thorsten wrote:
On 14.02.2009 16:18, Julian Sikorski wrote:
this is for F10/testing. For some reason it did not get multilib'd properly.
Reason found, workaround applied, repo pushed, discussing real fix with
mschwendt currently
Disabling the internal
2009/2/17 Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com:
On Sun, 15 Feb 2009 13:12:30 +0100, Thorsten wrote:
On 14.02.2009 16:18, Julian Sikorski wrote:
this is for F10/testing. For some reason it did not get multilib'd
properly.
Reason found, workaround applied, repo pushed, discussing real fix
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 15:14:47 +0100, Nicolas wrote:
So it would be better IMO that:
Instead to add a requires on a library, let's make the -devel
subpackage to requires
%{name}-libs-%{_target_cpu} = %{version}-%{release} (which the -libs
already provides and it is how the main requires the
On 14.02.2009 16:18, Julian Sikorski wrote:
this is for F10/testing. For some reason it did not get multilib'd properly.
Reason found, workaround applied, repo pushed, discussing real fix with
mschwendt currently
CU
knurd
Hi,
this is for F10/testing. For some reason it did not get multilib'd properly.
Julian
