[rrd-users] Re: 'graph' command printing to stdout

2004-12-09 Thread Erik de Mare
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Hello, > >I'm making my first steps with RRD (used MRTG several years ago), and >I'm noticing that 'rrdtool graph...' command prints out something to >stdout. In my case it prints: 800x205 > > > that is the size of the picture, 800x205 pixels nothing to worry about. >

[rrd-users] 'graph' command printing to stdout

2004-12-09 Thread ogjunk-rrd
Hello, I'm making my first steps with RRD (used MRTG several years ago), and I'm noticing that 'rrdtool graph...' command prints out something to stdout. In my case it prints: 800x205 This happens when I graph the RRD data using this command: $RRD graph memory-120.png --step 120 --imgformat PNG

[rrd-users] Re: rrdtool create

2004-12-09 Thread Georges Toth
> If you use the DERIVE_with_minimum_rate_zero method, you are telling > RRDtool to ignore the updates around the reset. This results in a loss > of information (a couple of updates will result in unknown data). i see > If you use the tripple_update method, you are telling RRDtool what the > rat

[rrd-users] Re: rrdtool create

2004-12-09 Thread Alex van den Bogaerdt
On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 01:30:37PM +0100, Georges Toth wrote: > > Would you have set a sane maximum rate, as instructed by the documentation, > > this rate would have been ignored and you'd have ended up with unknown > > data. Since you really don't know the rate before and after the reset, > > t

[rrd-users] Re: rrdtool create

2004-12-09 Thread Georges Toth
> No, it's not. > <> > This happened in 300 seconds, so thats about 61,500,000,000,000,000 > per second. You programmed your RRA to behave like this. thnx for the explanation > Would you have set a sane maximum rate, as instructed by the documentation, > this rate would have been ignored an

[rrd-users] Re: Cisco NAM + Perl + SNMP + RMON2 + RRDtool

2004-12-09 Thread Serge Maandag
> > > RRA:LAST:0.5:30:800 > > > RRA:LAST:0.5:120:800 > > > > That is two times the same resolution, but with different sizes. > > The first one is redundant. > > Sure? Oops.. Misread it as if it said: RRA:LAST:0.5:800:30 RRA:LAST:0.5:800:120 > It should be the last seen rate. Never used it so

[rrd-users] Re: rrdtool create

2004-12-09 Thread Alex van den Bogaerdt
On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 11:45:54PM +0100, Georges Toth wrote: > > Counter, or derive. > > i would prefer not to recreate everything :-) It is possible to change the datasource type of an existing database. This should probably not be done untill you have a better understanding of how rrdtool wor