Hi Fabien,
look at this ...
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/1/9/310
it seems to be a kernel bug ...
cheers
tobi
Today Fabien Wernli wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 01:27:03AM +0100, Tobias Oetiker wrote:
> > I don't think it has todo with noatime ... it is the mtime which
> > does not get updated,
On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 01:27:03AM +0100, Tobias Oetiker wrote:
> I don't think it has todo with noatime ... it is the mtime which
> does not get updated, right ? I have seen the same happening with
> samba database files ...
I know - and yes, the atime _is_ being modified. It's the mtime which st
Thanks for the previous help, I've managed to get everything working!
Now comes to the time to 'beautify' the graphs themselves, and I would like
to add a gradient to the area below the graph line.
In one case, the graph is a percentage, where:
- 0 to 60% should be gree
- 61 to 90% yellow
- 90
On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 01:59:50PM -0400, Andy Riebs wrote:
> Is your disk mounted with the "noatime" attribute, by any chance?
I already checked: it's not!
/dev/md10 /srv xfs rw,nosuid,nodev,sunit=128,swidth=256 0 0
___
rrd-users mailing list
rrd-users
Fabien,
Is your disk mounted with the "noatime" attribute, by any chance?
/andy
On Tue, 2007-10-30 at 17:51 +, Tobias Oetiker wrote:
> Hi Fabien,
>
> hmmm this would indicate the linux does not bother to update the
> timestamp of an mmaped file ... guess this is not optimal for
> backups an
Hi Fabien,
hmmm this would indicate the linux does not bother to update the
timestamp of an mmaped file ... guess this is not optimal for
backups and such ...
anyone got any insight into this ?
it might be good from a performance standpoint though, since this
will reduce filesystem meta data upd
Hi,
I just noticed that timestamps of RRDs stopped to be updated
since my upgrade to 1.2.99907080300
Any idea why?
___
rrd-users mailing list
rrd-users@lists.oetiker.ch
https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/rrd-users
