On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 12:57:08PM -0500, Shriver, Daniel wrote:
> "GAUGE does not save the rate of change. It saves the actual value
> itself. There are no divisions or calculations. Note though, GAUGE,
> like all other types IS normalized. Thus if a value comes in at an
> off interval timing (s
I didn't get tripped up by this but if it people are often confused
about this*
maybe changing the wording in parts of the tutorial might get rid of
some of the
confusion. I'm not great on tech. writing- does this make it more
clear:
"GAUGE does not save the rate of change. It saves the actual val
I recently began creating a fifth graph (Last 3 years) to go along with
the typical MRTG-like four (Last Day, Week, Month, Year). But, I noticed
that the statistics for the new 3 Year graph do not match the 1 year graph
even though there are only about 7 months worth of data, and you would
thin
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 10:51:58AM -0600, Marc Powell wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:rrd-users-
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 10:19 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; rrd-users@lists.oetiker.ch
>
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 06:18:55PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> My biggest assumption was that the documentation was correct, this seems
> to be incorrect, as the tutorial rrd_beginners
> http://oss.oetiker.ch/rrdtool/tut/rrd-beginners.en.html states quiet
> clearly:
> "GAUGE does not sav
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:rrd-users-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 10:19 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; rrd-users@lists.oetiker.ch
> Subject: Re: [rrd-users] values being averaged.
>
> Thanks for the reply,
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I had already read through the documentation, man pages and tutorials
>before posting. I had also spent some time with just trial and error
>where I wanted to clarify some of the examples as see what happened if.
>So your assumption was wrong :-)
>
>My biggest assumptio
Thanks for the reply,
I had already read through the documentation, man pages and tutorials
before posting. I had also spent some time with just trial and error
where I wanted to clarify some of the examples as see what happened if.
So your assumption was wrong :-)
My biggest assumption was that
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 03:27:05PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The problem is that the value displayed on the graphs for number of
> clients (as in Client server) shows 0.6 of a client! Well, since we all
> know client connections can only be integer values this is obviously
> wrong.
It is
Hi
I've been playing around with RRDtool as it looks like a tool that can
in the long run save me a lot of time. My current requirement is to
collect data related to a cluster of Linux machines.
I have seen another post in January 2008 with what sounds like the same
problem and the solution do
10 matches
Mail list logo
