I tried that and it's not working.
Dawn Keenan-2 wrote:
>
> Meddea wrote:
>> Hi.
>> How can I convert a RRD file from version 0003 to version 0001?
>> I appreciate any help you can give me.
>
> Try dumping the file (rrddump,
> http://oss.oetiker.ch/rrdtool/doc/rrddump.en.html) and using an ol
Running NSLU2 with unslung would create about 10 graphs of about the same
size as yours within 10-15 seconds
- Original Message -
From: "Sysadmin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 2:29 AM
Subject: Re: [rrd-users] rrdtool & NSLU2
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
>
Hi there --
I'm using net-snmp to gather some information from a few hundred
servers and I noticed the memBuffer doesn't exist on a few FreeBSD
servers, causing the DS to be filled with NaN values.
The problem occurs when I use memBuffer on a RPN subtraction like this:
CDEF:memUsedReal
=mem
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> how slow is sl? How long does your "rrdtool graph" command take
> to produce the output?
>
>
about 30 minutes for 1 graph, an I have errors :
http://82.232.210.249/index.html
>> I am trying to make graph with a NSLU2 running debian etch.
>> And the
Hi,
how slow is sl? How long does your "rrdtool graph" command take
to produce the output?
> I am trying to make graph with a NSLU2 running debian etch.
> And the rrdtool graph is so sl.
Are you using the debian rrdtool package available via apt-get or did
you build rrdtool yours
Hi,
I am trying to make graph with a NSLU2 running debian etch.
And the rrdtool graph is so sl.
I read that I have to compile rrdtool without optimizations, how can I
do that ?
Or perhap's my script is bad...
Best regards
Here is my script :
graph.sh
#!/bin/bash
# configuration
# repe
Meddea wrote:
> Hi.
> How can I convert a RRD file from version 0003 to version 0001?
> I appreciate any help you can give me.
Try dumping the file (rrddump,
http://oss.oetiker.ch/rrdtool/doc/rrddump.en.html) and using an old
version of rrdtool to restore it.
--Dawn
___
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 05:50:04PM +0100, Gwenael Lahay wrote:
> Do you really think that using a recent version of rrdtool will improve the
> performance ?
definitely worth a try. I had, at least on a 2.6.x linux kernel, a huge
performance gain
___
rrd