Yes both are 32 bit. From what Tobi says I assume its just down to
some underlying type def on one side being slightly different to
the other even though the hardware architecture / bit width is
identical.
Steve
- Original Message -
From: "Tobias Oetiker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> the ap
Hi Fabien,
the approach here is quite pragmatic,
rrdtool encodes a number 8.642135E130 and looks if the number in
the rrd file is the same ... if it is not, it complains ...
cheers
tobi
Today Fabien Wernli wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 01:48:57AM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
> > While I c
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 01:48:57AM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
> While I can understand architecture issues moving between different
> endian CPU architectures it seems a bit strange to get arch errors
> when transporting between two OS's on the same architecture.
are you sure both were 32 (64)
While I can understand architecture issues moving between different
endian CPU architectures it seems a bit strange to get arch errors
when transporting between two OS's on the same architecture.
rrdtool info cr1.ixnlon_4.rrd
ERROR: This RRD was created on other architecture
Is this by design or
