Changing the subject line ...
Mark Seger wrote: >>>btw - just to toss in an interesting wrinkle did you know if you sample >>>network statistics once a second you will periodically get an invalid >>>value because of the frequency at which linux updates its network >>>counters? the only way I'm able to get accurate network statistics near >>>that rate is to sample them every 0.9765 seconds. I can go into more >>>detail if anyone really cares. 8-) >>> >> >>I'm curious ... >> >ahh! I knew I'd get someone to ask... The trick is how easily can >I explain this. > >It turns out that unlike most systems counters which get updated >quite frequently, network counters only get updated about once a >second but not exactly once a second! It turns out they get updated >every 0.9765 seconds. So in fact you don't get invalid data, you get data which is valid but not what you expected if you don't allow for it. The same thing would happen if it updated at exactly 1s intervals but your monitoring takes slightly longer than 1s. In other words, if you don't understand what you are measuring ... _______________________________________________ rrd-users mailing list rrd-users@lists.oetiker.ch https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/rrd-users
