Ralf,
the average you get is the average of the data after it has been
made 'fit' for display if this is causing confusion, you may
calculate the data externally using rrdtool fetch for example and
add it into the graph
for all normal cases the average will not be affected noticably by
this.
On Tuesday 04 October 2005 13:40, Alex van den Bogaerdt wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 10:20:11AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> > > I'm sure a thourough analysis would explain the differences.
> > > For research, see footer.
> >
> > Yes, this is what I have already assumed during my studies.
On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 10:20:11AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I'm sure a thourough analysis would explain the differences.
> > For research, see footer.
>
> Yes, this is what I have already assumed during my studies. Even if
> you use GPRINT, the results are also different depending on
On Tuesday 04 October 2005 01:26, Alex van den Bogaerdt wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 07:17:00PM -0400, Gregory (Grisha)
Trubetskoy wrote:
> > Note that the only thing different above is --width. Is this a
> > feature or a bug? :-) Sorry, I didn't have time to research this
> > further, just th
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 07:17:00PM -0400, Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote:
> Note that the only thing different above is --width. Is this a feature or
> a bug? :-) Sorry, I didn't have time to research this further, just
> thought someone on the list might know right away.
Different graph siz
