[rrd-users] Re: large values equal NaN?

2005-12-09 Thread John Barber
e: > Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2005 07:26:09 -0500 > From: John Barber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: rrd-users@list.ee.ethz.ch > Subject: [rrd-users] Re: large values equal NaN? > > Sounds to me like you set a max value of about 10 Billion when you > created the rrd. > > just a

[rrd-users] Re: large values equal NaN?

2005-12-09 Thread John Barber
Sounds to me like you set a max value of about 10 Billion when you created the rrd. just a thought. >>> Greg Redder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 12/8/2005 5:11 PM >>> For years I've been running rrdtool as the basis for my cricket stats. I recently noticed that values greater than about 10 billion are

[rrd-users] Re: large values equal NaN?

2005-12-09 Thread Alex van den Bogaerdt
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 03:11:33PM -0700, Greg Redder wrote: > Here's what I do. I collect several values via SNMP and add them together > with a shell script. Then, the Cricket program via RRDs.pm (RRDs::update) > writes the values to the database. However, while I can see what value is > atte