Devante Vargas wrote:
> I am working on creating a graph for my ping script. It collects, min, max
> and average response times. I have added the ::STACK for the AREA after the
> first AREA is defined. Problem is it adds the next two on top and moves it up
> a notch, e.g. Min response time is
I am working on creating a graph for my ping script. It collects, min, max
and average response times. I have added the ::STACK for the AREA after the
first AREA is defined. Problem is it adds the next two on top and moves it
up a notch, e.g. Min response time is 0.42 (this is measured accurately a
Hi Chris!
What you are requesting is currently not possible - at least not easily.
The only thing I can offer you as am option is this "red/green" approach -
which is not 100% what you want.
As for using the cdef as fraction - I did not say that it may work for you
fully, but it may come close
Hi Martin,
Thank you for taking your time to respond.
To ensure I understand this correctly, this will print a TICK on the
graph for each DS. It will either be RED or GREEN depending
on the value of the DS?
The problem I have is I am graphing classes for QoS with a different
number of classes pe
OK, so assuming those 3:
Here a "Red/green" colorcoding you could also use:
CDEF:DS1GREEN=DS1,UN,0,1,IF
CDEF:DS1RED=DS1,UN,1,0,IF
CDEF:DS2GREEN=DS2,UN,0,1,IF
CDEF:DS2RED=DS2,UN,1,0,IF
CDEF:DS3GREEN=DS3,UN,0,1,IF
CDEF:DS3RED=DS3,UN,1,0,IF
TICK:DS1GREEN#00ff00:-.03
TICK:DS1RED#ff:-.03
TICK:DS2GRE
Hi!
What about the following:
CDEF:CNTUNKN=DS1,UN,1,0,IF,DS2,UN,1,0,IF,+,DS3,UN,1,0,IF,+
CDEF:TICK1=CNTUNKN,1,EQ,1,UNKN,IF
CDEF:TICK2=CNTUNKN,2,EQ,1,UNKN,IF
CDEF:TICK3=CNTUNKN,3,EQ,1,UNKN,IF
TICK:TICK1#FF:-0.03
TICK:TICK2#00FF00:-0.02
TIC
Hi,
> One line at the top (or bottom) of the graph, then stack a suffient amount
> in the "wrong" direction. I never tried it, but stacking -50M "on top" of
> 150M should get you at 100M.
So this works normally when not working at infinity:
LINE3:100#FF
LINE3:-1#00FF00::STACK
I assu
I have not fully understood how you want your graph to look visually.
But maybe you can use TICK to draw your errors.
I remember that I have done so to highlight times when we have exceeded
predictions.
You could obviously paint multiple TICKS for different types and paint them
with different co
> CDEF:DSxH=DSx,0,GT,INF,UNKN,IF
> LINE3:DSxH#xx
>
> This will draw a line at INF using the classes colour if errors were
> detected in that class. If multiple classes have drops then the line
> will get overwritten with the later colour. I could use transparency
> but then it is usually diffic
Hi,
I am graphing class based interface statistics using RRDTOOL and I am
trying to find a way to graph errors on the same graph. At the moment
if I detect errors I am highlighting the background with an AREA using
the INF or NEGINF functions. This works fine and I can see if I had
errors during t
Can't seem to get the stacking working... This is the graphing command:
rrdtool graph test.png -i --end now --start -30m --width 600 \
--height 200 -l 0 --title 'DSL stats' \
DEF:dsratemi=/var/db/604t.rrd:dsrate:MIN \
DEF:usratemi=/var/db/604t.rrd:usrate:MIN \
AREA:usratemi#d0ffd0:Upstream \
AREA:
11 matches
Mail list logo
