Re: [rrd-users] Trouble graphing small values

2008-02-09 Thread Lazy
2008/2/9, Alex van den Bogaerdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 11:59:38PM +0100, Lazy wrote: > > > I'm getting values around 15m(on graphs) when rrd contains small > > positive values. > > You are confusing 15m for 15M. > > See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SI_prefix ops I didn't ca

Re: [rrd-users] Trouble graphing small values

2008-02-09 Thread fredrik
15m is a small positive value (0.015). Lazy wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm getting values around 15m(on graphs) when rrd contains small > positive values. > > the graphing command "rrdtool graph load.png --imgformat PNG -s -1000 > DEF:a=load.rrd:load:AVERAGE AREA:a\#ff" > > the load.rrd dump >

Re: [rrd-users] Trouble graphing small values

2008-02-09 Thread Fabien Wernli
On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 11:59:38PM +0100, Lazy wrote: > I'm getting values around 15m(on graphs) when rrd contains small > positive values. you can put an 'IF' directive with a minimum value on your graph directives if you want ___ rrd-users mailing lis

Re: [rrd-users] Trouble graphing small values

2008-02-08 Thread Alex van den Bogaerdt
On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 11:59:38PM +0100, Lazy wrote: > I'm getting values around 15m(on graphs) when rrd contains small > positive values. You are confusing 15m for 15M. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SI_prefix -- Alex van den Bogaerdt http://www.vandenbogaerdt.nl/rrdtool/ _

[rrd-users] Trouble graphing small values

2008-02-08 Thread Lazy
Hi all, I'm getting values around 15m(on graphs) when rrd contains small positive values. the graphing command "rrdtool graph load.png --imgformat PNG -s -1000 DEF:a=load.rrd:load:AVERAGE AREA:a\#ff" the load.rrd dump 0003 60 1202509716 load