On 10 Jul 2007, at 13:16, David Chelimsky wrote:
> This is pretty standard in mocking frameworks. In fact, your
> frustration was Jim Weirich's motivation for writing Flexmock, so you
> may want to give that framework a shot.
> This tells the Date class object to ignore all extract_from_rails_
On 7/10/07, Ashley Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> Just wrote myself a Date.extract_from_rails_hash to handle parsing
> the "date(1i)", "date(2i)" parameters created in the controller
> params. I've got a method that needs to call this either once or
> twice, depending on the contents of
Hi
Just wrote myself a Date.extract_from_rails_hash to handle parsing
the "date(1i)", "date(2i)" parameters created in the controller
params. I've got a method that needs to call this either once or
twice, depending on the contents of the form (one section of the form
is rendered conditio
On 7/10/07, aslak hellesoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/10/07, Marcus Ahnve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Whether or not to start with the view is a topic of great debate. Many
> > agile luminaries propose waiting with the ui for as long as possible,
> > whereas 37Signals for example won't st
On 7/10/07, Marcus Ahnve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Whether or not to start with the view is a topic of great debate. Many
> agile luminaries propose waiting with the ui for as long as possible,
> whereas 37Signals for example won't start coding without a full HTML
> mockup.
>
I wouldn't call my
Whether or not to start with the view is a topic of great debate. Many
agile luminaries propose waiting with the ui for as long as possible,
whereas 37Signals for example won't start coding without a full HTML
mockup.
I've tried all different ways - even starting with the model - but I
agree with
