On 9/15/07, s.ross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Look at your test.log and you can see exactly what was rendered. That should
> explain why the example is failing. This works best if you can silence the
> logs for all examples other than the one you are testing.
>
Better if you run just that exampl
Look at your test.log and you can see exactly what was rendered. That
should explain why the example is failing. This works best if you can
silence the logs for all examples other than the one you are testing.
On Sep 14, 2007, at 7:35 PM, sinclair bain wrote:
Hi,
A controller has a method
On Sep 14, 2007, at 7:10 PM, Pat Maddox wrote:
> I agree that it would be nice if story runner treats an empty
> Given/When/Then as pending. But what do you mean it treats pending as
> an error case?
The actual implementation of how a Scenario is defined as pending.
The implementation raises
On Sep 14, 2007, at 7:10 PM, Pat Maddox wrote:
> I agree that it would be nice if story runner treats an empty
> Given/When/Then as pending. But what do you mean it treats pending as
> an error case?
>
Resending. Believe that my re-reponse, sent a couple of hours ago,
was eaten. ;-)
The act
On 9/14/07, Pat Maddox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/14/07, James Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm trying to get up and running with StoryRunner. I have a story that
> > looks something like the following, but the call to mock_model
> > produces the exception listed below.
Hi,
A controller has a method with the following
def update
...
if @config.update_attributes ( params[:new_config] )
redirect_to :action => :index
else
* render :action => :edit, :id => params[:id] # this line here*
end
...
end
The example has the following
On 9/14/07, James Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to get up and running with StoryRunner. I have a story that
> looks something like the following, but the call to mock_model
> produces the exception listed below. Am I just misunderstanding the
> concept? Are mocks not meant
Hi,
I'm trying to get up and running with StoryRunner. I have a story that
looks something like the following, but the call to mock_model
produces the exception listed below. Am I just misunderstanding the
concept? Are mocks not meant to be used in stories like this? Or is
this a bug? Changing @us
On 9/14/07, Evan David Light <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've been using RSpec in anger for perhaps a total of a few days and just
> started playing with Story Runner. Love it.
>
> I also started working on a patch, which ought to be simple, to allow for
> Scenarios without supplied blocks t
Hi,
A controller has a method with the following
def update
...
if @config.update_attributes( params[:new_config] )
redirect_to :action => :index
else
* render :action => :edit, :id => params[:id] # this line here*
end
...
end
The example has the following
it
Hey list,
The time it takes for my specs to run is starting to get a little long (~45
seconds), and annoying enough for me to do something about it.
I've written a simple formatter that prints out the top 10 slowest examples
in an attempt to identify any low hanging fruit amongst a spec suite.
h
I've been using RSpec in anger for perhaps a total of a few days
and just started playing with Story Runner. Love it.
I also started working on a patch, which ought to be simple, to
allow for Scenarios without supplied blocks to be treated as pending
-- much like "it" in Spec::DSL::Exam
Hi folks,
Is there any way I can call #include from within a shared behaviour
without it blowing up?:
> vendor/plugins/rspec/lib/spec/dsl/shared_behaviour.rb:48:in
> `included': private method `include' called for #
> (NoMethodError)
More detail: I have a spec/concerns directory which cont
On 14.9.2007, at 12.02, Andreas Wolff wrote:
Hey everyone.
I really stuck on testing a nested controller. I'm trying to make a
request using get and afterwards checking the response by
response.should ...
My routes.rb looks like this:
map.resources :writers do |writers|
writers.resources :no
Ok. this was stupid :) I found the answer two minutes later:
You cannot use the url helper here, but if you provide the writers id
in the request everything works fine:
testing the route:
route_for(:controller => "notes", :action => "show", :id => 1, :writer_id => 1)
testing the request by:
get
Hey everyone.
I really stuck on testing a nested controller. I'm trying to make a
request using get and afterwards checking the response by
response.should ...
My routes.rb looks like this:
map.resources :writers do |writers|
writers.resources :notes
end
In my notes_controller_spec.rb
def do_
16 matches
Mail list logo
