yep, that did it :)
thx
On Mar 18, 2008, at 11:50 PM, Zach Dennis wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 11:13 PM, linojon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi, whats the correct way to spec a rescue? This will raise it but
>> doesnt
>> test my code's response
>>
>>
>>
>> # controller
>>
>> def edit
>
rails/plugin is git aware already in trunk for cloning a git repository.
However, you can only clone from the git repository root (the directory
which contains the .git directory). You can't clone from a subdirectory.
That's why the project needs to be split to install both rspec and
rspec_on_rail
Zach Dennis wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 5:43 PM, Ben Mabey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Zach Dennis wrote:
>> > Can someone change this implementation and still have your tests pass,
>> > but have the implementation be broken? If they can then yes it is
>> > worth the 40 lines.
>> >
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 11:13 PM, linojon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, whats the correct way to spec a rescue? This will raise it but doesnt
> test my code's response
>
>
>
> # controller
>
> def edit
> @foo = Foo.find(params[:id])
> rescue
> flash[:notice] = "Unknown foo #{params[:
Hello,
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 4:15 AM, David Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello fellow RSpec users.
>
> Before you all start warming up your flame throwers please let me explain my
> Subject line.
>
> I've been working over 4 months on a large Rails project with a few other
> developers.
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 10:41 PM, Dominic Sisneros <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is a request to split up the repository into at least two repositories
>
> rspec
> rspec_core (loaded as svn_external or git submodule)
> rspec_on_rails (loaded as svn_external or git submodule)
>
> We coul
Hi, whats the correct way to spec a rescue? This will raise it but
doesnt test my code's response
# controller
def edit
@foo = Foo.find(params[:id])
rescue
flash[:notice] = "Unknown foo #{params[:id]}"
redirect_to foos_path
end
# spec
it "should flash error if not found
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 8:41 PM, Dominic Sisneros <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is a request to split up the repository into at least two repositories
I forwarded this to
http://rspec.lighthouseapp.com/projects/5645/tickets/347. Please make
future feature requests there instead of this mailing
This is a request to split up the repository into at least two repositories
rspec
rspec_core (loaded as svn_external or git submodule)
rspec_on_rails (loaded as svn_external or git submodule)
We could load the plugins the same way as before
ruby script/plugin install http://rspec.rubyforg
Ok, last one - for your interest validates_length_of can be used for
this purpose. There is an open bug/patch on the rails trac regarding the
:within parameter but the :minimum works fine for me. As for the example
the method called on @item.images is #size and not #count so
-> @item.images.sho
James Deville wrote:
> Doh! I can't believe that I missed that.
>
> You can also use if self.images.size.zero?
>
> Just a little more readable.
>
> James Deville
You were writing while i was writing :D
nice one, i didn't know the #zero? - way more readable :)
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-for
Ok, i'm really stupid... i was taking a break (i've been on the pc for
several hours) and the problem came to me before reading your posts :D
Obviously the "if self.images.count" was wyyy too stupid! added the
necessary == 0 and everything is fine...
Thanks a lot anyway :)
--
Posted via htt
Doh! I can't believe that I missed that.
You can also use if self.images.size.zero?
Just a little more readable.
James Deville
On Mar 18, 2008, at 4:38 PM, Rafael Mueller wrote:
Hi Nikos,
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 8:26 PM, Nikos Dimitrakopoulos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
the model:
class
On Mar 18, 2008, at 4:26 PM, Nikos Dimitrakopoulos wrote:
> Hi there all. Sorry if the question sounds silly but i'm rather new at
> the 'mocking' stuff... So here is my problem (code helps more than
> talking):
>
> the model:
>
> class Item < ActiveRecord::Base
> ...
> has_many :images, :depend
Hi Nikos,
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 8:26 PM, Nikos Dimitrakopoulos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> the model:
> class Item < ActiveRecord::Base
> has_many :images, :dependent => :destroy
> protected
> def validate
> errors.add(:images, "cannot be empty") if self.images.count
> end
> end
se
Hi there all. Sorry if the question sounds silly but i'm rather new at
the 'mocking' stuff... So here is my problem (code helps more than
talking):
the model:
class Item < ActiveRecord::Base
...
has_many :images, :dependent => :destroy
...
protected
def validate
errors.add(:image
On 10 Mar 2008, at 12:42, Edvard Majakari wrote:
> Being able to choose which
> contexts/describes or individual specs will be run has been more than
> sufficient to me, but of course, YNMDFTOM.
Hi Edvard
Sorry for the delayed reaction, but was just catching up on old posts
and saw this. I
On 18 Mar 2008, at 19:38, Kyle Hargraves wrote:
> config.load_paths += Dir[File.join('vendor', 'gems', '*',
> 'lib')].map do |libdir|
>File.expand_path(libdir)
> end
>
> This'll let it be loaded as a gem and you can put this in spec_helper:
>
> require 'rspec_hpricot_matchers'
>
On Mar 18, 2008, at 6:36 AM, Alan Larkin wrote:
> David Schmidt wrote:
>> Hello fellow RSpec users.
>>
>> Before you all start warming up your flame throwers please let me
>> explain my Subject line.
>>
>> I've been working over 4 months on a large Rails project with a few
>> other developers. Te
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 9:04 AM, Ashley Moran
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 17/03/2008, Kyle Hargraves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > We discussed this in a ticket on lighthouse, and I ended up writing a
> > workalike that's sitting atop hpricot. It's not quite identical, but
> > generally clos
On 3/17/08, Rick DeNatale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [quite a lot]
Okay, I've got it working now. The problem seems to be wrapped up in
the use of transactional fixtures to load the db, and the fact that
fixture teardown actually happens in the SETUP phase, in other words
when you declare a fix
On 17/03/2008, Kyle Hargraves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> We discussed this in a ticket on lighthouse, and I ended up writing a
> workalike that's sitting atop hpricot. It's not quite identical, but
> generally close enough and so far does everything I've needed:
>
> http://github.com/pd/rspec_h
James Deville wrote:
> Using the -e option from the command line, you can also specify a
> string which is to be run, this is a way to run only one describe
> block, or one it block. The rake task method suggested by Edvard is
> the other option
I'm having problems with the -e option - it doesn't
David Schmidt wrote:
> Hello fellow RSpec users.
>
> Before you all start warming up your flame throwers please let me
> explain my Subject line.
>
> I've been working over 4 months on a large Rails project with a few
> other developers. Test coverage was spotty at best, though they *were*
>
On 17/03/2008, Zach Dennis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> http://git.or.cz/course/svn.html
>
> and also search google for "git for svn users"
>
> Zach
Ta - I ended up doing a git clone into our SVN repo. Not sure if that's a
good idea but seems to work...
Ashley
___
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 5:04 AM, Chris Parsons
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi David
>
>
> On 18 Mar 2008, at 08:15, David Schmidt wrote:
>
> > Here is his email to me, less his signature as I don't want to make
> > this personal. I'd like to see what the RSpec user community has to
> > say in
Hi David
On 18 Mar 2008, at 08:15, David Schmidt wrote:
> Here is his email to me, less his signature as I don't want to make
> this personal. I'd like to see what the RSpec user community has to
> say in response to his comments, below:
[snip email]
For me, it basically boils down to: use
Hello fellow RSpec users.
Before you all start warming up your flame throwers please let me
explain my Subject line.
I've been working over 4 months on a large Rails project with a few
other developers. Test coverage was spotty at best, though they
*were* RSpec tests. One of the other d
28 matches
Mail list logo
