On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 2:59 AM, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jun 29, 2008, at 11:38 AM, Britt Mileshosky wrote:
>>> My instinct about this is that it would encourage long methods because
>>> it would make it less painful to test them, so I would be adverse to
>>> anything that l
On Jun 29, 2008, at 11:38 AM, Britt Mileshosky wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: rspec-users@rubyforge.org
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 11:20:46 -0500
Subject: Re: [rspec-users] Stopping example execution?
On Jun 29, 2008, at 11:18 AM, Britt Mileshosky wrote
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: rspec-users@rubyforge.org
> Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 11:20:46 -0500
> Subject: Re: [rspec-users] Stopping example execution?
>
> On Jun 29, 2008, at 11:18 AM, Britt Mileshosky wrote:
>> However, do you see where something lik
On Jun 29, 2008, at 11:18 AM, Britt Mileshosky wrote:
However, do you see where something like a return statement or end
example statement could be beneficial?
If you are working from the top down with your controller action
execution, then you only need to test your expectation
and then bail
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: rspec-users@rubyforge.org
> Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 06:09:47 -0500
> Subject: Re: [rspec-users] Stopping example execution?
>
> On Jun 28, 2008, at 7:27 PM, Britt Mileshosky wrote:
>
>> -
On Jun 28, 2008, at 7:27 PM, Britt Mileshosky wrote:
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 18:24:17 -0500
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: rspec-users@rubyforge.org
Subject: Re: [rspec-users] Stopping example execution?
On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 5:57 PM, Britt Mileshosky
wro
