On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 9:54 PM, Zach Dennis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is nothing wrong with this, but there are times when it feels
> dirty and unnecessary to create yet another class with some methods
The proposed solution looks very nice, but I've never been convinced by the
"yet an
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 12:24 AM, Tero Tilus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008-08-12 20:25, Zach Dennis:
>> Sometimes I don't have a full need to make a class to do something,
>
> How's that _essentially_ different from making a class or extending an
> existing class? I am not knowledgeable enough
2008-08-12 20:25, Zach Dennis:
> Sometimes I don't have a full need to make a class to do something,
How's that _essentially_ different from making a class or extending an
existing class? I am not knowledgeable enough to "just see" it, and
becaus I can't understand the motivation, I'm bound to ha
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 7:25 PM, Zach Dennis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sometimes I don't have a full need to make a class to do something,
> yet I want something readable and concise. This is influenced from the
> joys of JavaScript.
>
> Today I made this happen. Love it, like it, hate it, WDYT?
Sometimes I don't have a full need to make a class to do something,
yet I want something readable and concise. This is influenced from the
joys of JavaScript.
Today I made this happen. Love it, like it, hate it, WDYT?
Spec::Story::Runner.register_listener FunctionalStruct.new(
:run_started => l
We are trying to automate the running of our rspec tests for our Rails app
on a build server using Capistrano. The problem is that Capistrano seems to
think that the command called to run the model tests failed when in fact I
believe it succeeded. I believe the problem has to do with the return co
Can I help the project by writing some docs about the plain-text
story runner for the rspec.info website? It would surely help me to
get it wired in my own mind if I have to write it up for the world.
Would this be helpful / appreciated?
What format would you want them in?
cheers,
Matt
___
