Hi guys. I'm unable to run my specs through a spec server. I've spent
several hours searching and playing around with this problem, and I
simply can't find a solution. So if anyone has any suggestions, I'm
all ears.
Does script/server need to be running in conjunction with the spec
server?
I have
Hi,
I just install rspec (and rspec-rails) from git and tried to write a
user story, its all good but the output lacks the parameters i used.
Here's an example of what is happening
=== RSPEC FILE stories/example.rb ===
Story "A story", %{
As a user
I want to do something
So I can have some b
David Chelimsky wrote:
Agreed. Tools is tools. Process is process. (boat is boat )
And parts is parts. Let's not forget that:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OTzLVIc-O5E
Jay
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge
Hi guys. I'm unable to run my specs through a spec server. I've spent
several hours searching and playing around with this problem, and I
simply can't find a solution. So if anyone has any suggestions, I'm
all ears.
Does script/server need to be running in conjunction with the spec
server
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 9:53 PM, Jim Gay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Aug 24, 2008, at 10:39 AM, Muhammad Ichsan wrote:
>
> Check out this thread:
> http://groups.google.com/group/rspec/browse_thread/thread/7bb484873d327232/a2d46045dcbf1066?lnk=st&q=Should(not%3F)+test+associations+(was%3A+Deali
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 12:53 PM, Jonathan Linowes
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Aug 20, 2008, at 10:20 AM, David Chelimsky wrote:
>>
>> I see them as very different.
>>
>> User Stories are inputs to a development process and Features are the
>> outputs.
>
> I decided to churn on this for a few
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 9:44 AM, Muhammad Ichsan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> Before I know spec'ing, I've been practicing testing using JUnit. I
> remember that once Kent Beck said (if I'm not mistaken) that we should
> not test exhaustively. Instead, we should test until our doubt i
On Aug 24, 2008, at 10:39 AM, Muhammad Ichsan wrote:
Dear All,
I'm a new member here. I've been using RSpec since my first Rails
project. I'm proud that I've deliver the most bugs free app in my
office (In my country, spec'ing even autotesting is not common).
Thanks to Ruby community that make
Dear All,
Before I know spec'ing, I've been practicing testing using JUnit. I
remember that once Kent Beck said (if I'm not mistaken) that we should
not test exhaustively. Instead, we should test until our doubt in the
quality is gone. What about spec'ing? Is spec'ing aimed to create good
document
Dear All,
I'm a new member here. I've been using RSpec since my first Rails
project. I'm proud that I've deliver the most bugs free app in my
office (In my country, spec'ing even autotesting is not common).
Thanks to Ruby community that make autotesting very easy and
encouraging. I think Ruby is t
Pat Parslow wrote:
*snip*
>>
>
> I am getting the same problem on XP with a fresh install (ruby 1.8.6
> patch 111 - not so fresh, I admit) Rails 2.1 rspec 1.1.4
>
> I think the problem may be something to do with not being able to check
> out the rspec 1.4.1 after cloning the git. It complain
11 matches
Mail list logo
