Ben Mabey wrote:
> would be extremely helpful for your insights to be added to the wiki to
> help other people who are beginning and will probably have the same
> questions you have had.
As soon as I have an insight, my wife will faint...
I would love to assist in this manner, the difficulty bei
Ben Mabey wrote:
> As the cucumber wiki page says about autotest
> (http://github.com/aslakhellesoy/cucumber/wikis/autotest-integration) if
> you want to override the arguments used by autotest you need to define
> an 'autotest' profile in your cucumber.yml file. I added information
> about profi
Matt Wynne wrote:
> I think I might be right in saying that technique is likely to be
> deprecated in the future. I don't think it's recommended anymore. See
> my earlier response.
Thanks Matt. That is good to know.
Paul
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
_
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 5:57 PM, Brian Takita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
> I'm wondering if this is a discussion about taste.
I think you're right. I've been using the 'def self.foo' style in various
languages for almost 20 years, so of course it feels more natural to me.
These languages (excep
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 8:27 PM, Mark Wilden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 5:12 PM, Brian Takita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> I suppose that we can write our entire program with one LOC. I suppose
>> thats following YAGNI. Hell, why use do end? Its two extra lines of
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 5:12 PM, Brian Takita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> I suppose that we can write our entire program with one LOC. I suppose
> thats following YAGNI. Hell, why use do end? Its two extra lines of
> code all over the place.
That's not YAGNI. :) We need clarity now - there's no
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 7:58 PM, Mark Wilden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 4:40 PM, Brian Takita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> When maintaining code, I often wish I could travel back in time and
>> tell the writer "Don't do that". :)
>
> I don't see how we can solve th
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 4:40 PM, Brian Takita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> When maintaining code, I often wish I could travel back in time and
> tell the writer "Don't do that". :)
>
I don't see how we can solve the problem of people not following style
guidelines by giving them another style gui
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 6:43 PM, Mark Wilden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 1:59 PM, Brian Takita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>>
>> Its funny because I consider def self.foo harmful for a few reasons.
>>
>> def self.method_name is often mixed with instance methods. This makes
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 1:59 PM, Brian Takita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Its funny because I consider def self.foo harmful for a few reasons.
>
> def self.method_name is often mixed with instance methods. This makes
> reading the code confusing because there are two contexts that you
> need to de
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 12:58 AM, Andrei Erdoss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am using Restful Authentication and I would like to login in Cucumber. I
> am having trouble keeping the user logged in. I tried finding a solution for
> this everywhere. Only source is this article:
> http://
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 8:41 AM, Matt Wynne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry, I know this is off-topic, but I'd really like to know what the
> revered ruby-hackers who read this list think.
>
> See
> http://ozmm.org/posts/class__self_is_harmful.html
>
> I have adopted class << self, partly from r
James Byrne wrote:
>
> I understood that the purpose of autotest was that it ONLY ran a test
> for the changed file. However, with this setup, if I touch any file
> anywhere in the project then the full suite of feature tests apparently
> gets run. for UnitTest autotest only run the tests assoc
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 11:03 AM, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 9:06 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > it "should be invalid without an approved size" do
> > @adtag.attributes = valid_adtag_attributes.except(:size) # ONE
>
> attributes= does NOT
Given I have cucumber (0.1.10)
And I have ZenTest (3.11.0)
And I have features in sub-directories under a directory called
features
And Each feature sub-directory has a sub-directory called
step_definitions
And I have .feature files in the features sub-directories
And I have .rb files in
Tim Walker wrote:
> FWIW - I just did it and it seemed OK...
>
> /features/steps/holiday_steps.rb
> ...
> Then /^there should be 2 nodes in the control group$/ do
> Fixtures.create_fixtures("/../../test/fixtures", "holiday_schedules")
> end
> ...
>
> /test/fixtures/holiday_schedules.yml
> one:
Student <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> therein. If I'm looking at a group of methods in a file, I NEVER know
> which class I'm in until I search backwards for the "class" token.
You do if you use a good editor, like emacs
:)
Pat
___
rspec-users mailin
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 12:52 PM, Nathan Zook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's not a surprise, that's a feature. Know the difference between class
> variables and class instance variables.
Said the preacher to the choir.
But even features can cause surprises. It's a surprise when you're the
co
Everyone seems to agree on the basic issues, but are coming at it from
different viewpoints.
1) If you have a bunch of class methods, you have a problem.
(class#File: I mean you!)
2) Maintainability is paramount.
The question, then, should be: which of these patterns (class << self
or self.metho
James Byrne wrote:
>
> The error is that there exists no entity with id=1. Ideas?
I have resolved all of the test result differences between running
cucumber features -r features, rake features, and autotest. These were
dependent on whether testunit tests and their associated fixtures were
No arguments there! Just curious why it didn't work...
FWIW - I just did it and it seemed OK...
/features/steps/holiday_steps.rb
...
Then /^there should be 2 nodes in the control group$/ do
Fixtures.create_fixtures("/../../test/fixtures", "holiday_schedules")
end
...
/test/fixtures/holiday_sch
Ben Mabey wrote:
James Byrne wrote:
Ben Mabey wrote:
As the cucumber wiki page says about autotest
(http://github.com/aslakhellesoy/cucumber/wikis/autotest-integration)
if
you want to override the arguments used by autotest you need to define
an 'autotest' profile in your cucumber.yml file
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 8:46 PM, Ben Mabey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Avdi Grimm wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 12:17 PM, Matt Wynne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
And class variables are problematic in Rails in development mode because
of class reloading.
>>>
>>> And mor
James Byrne wrote:
Ben Mabey wrote:
As the cucumber wiki page says about autotest
(http://github.com/aslakhellesoy/cucumber/wikis/autotest-integration) if
you want to override the arguments used by autotest you need to define
an 'autotest' profile in your cucumber.yml file. I added informat
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 9:06 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is probably basic but I'm not seeing it. I'm using rspec & rspec-rails
> 1.1.11 on Ubuntu, & rails 2.1.0. Here's (the relevant parts of) my class I'm
> testing:
>
> class Adtag < ActiveRecord::Base
>
> # snip
>
> validates_inc
James Byrne wrote:
> So, depending upon the way cucumber is invoked, either all the tests
> pass, all the tests are skipped, or some of the tests pass and some fail
> one way and others pass and fail when invoked another way. This seems
> problematic for testing and it is far beyond my modest
Ben Mabey wrote:
> As the cucumber wiki page says about autotest
> (http://github.com/aslakhellesoy/cucumber/wikis/autotest-integration) if
> you want to override the arguments used by autotest you need to define
> an 'autotest' profile in your cucumber.yml file. I added information
> about profi
This is probably basic but I'm not seeing it. I'm using rspec & rspec-rails 1.1.11 on Ubuntu, & rails 2.1.0. Here's (the relevant parts of) my class I'm testing:
class Adtag < ActiveRecord::Base
# snip
validates_inclusion_of :size, :in => IAB_SIZES
validates_presence_of :code
validates_pre
David,
Thank you for your great insight. You're assumptions were correct and the
user wasn't getting logged in, because I didn't add all the necessary
paramenters for the user to be able to log in.
I am checking if the user is being created and also if after login, there is
a message posted, such
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 4:45 AM, Ashley Moran
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> This spec:
>
>it "should cache the HTML" do
> @uri.should_receive(:read).exactly(N).times
> 5.times { @low_graphics_page.story_body }
>end
>
> passes incorrectly for all N <= 4, and o
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 11:58 PM, Andrei Erdoss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am using Restful Authentication and I would like to login in Cucumber. I
> am having trouble keeping the user logged in. I tried finding a solution for
> this everywhere. Only source is this article:
> http://
Hi
This spec:
it "should cache the HTML" do
@uri.should_receive(:read).exactly(N).times
5.times { @low_graphics_page.story_body }
end
passes incorrectly for all N <= 4, and only fails for N > 6.
"once" and "twice" are similarly broken.
Is this a known issue
32 matches
Mail list logo
