s.ross wrote:
On Jan 15, 2009, at 7:24 AM, Mike Gaffney wrote:
s.ross's email about Screw.Unit brought prompted me to ask this
question:
1) What do you use for Javascript Unit testing?
I've tried jsspec and Screw.Unit and so far I'm thinking Screw.Unit is
better suited to what I'm doing. I
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 11:13 PM, James Byrne wrote:
> Matt Wynne wrote:
>
> >
> > +1 to all that. I feel like you get lectured quite a bit by this list
> > James, but you'd do well to heed the advice of some battle-hardened
> > journeymen, IMO.
> >
>
> I thought that you might like to know that,
If you're on Rails and use RSpec matchers, the latest official webrat 0.3.4
gem is broken. It doesn't contain the webrat/rspec-rails.rb file (a
packaging bug).
aslakhellesoy-webrat (0.3.2.2) works fine.
brynary's master branch is actually behind the latest release (0.3.4). It
still uses the 0.3.2
Can somebody confirm that the have_selector method yields to the block?
In all the test I have done it seems it does not work.
I even have try an step like this
when /whatever / do
response.should have_selector("table > tr:nth-child(#{2}) >
td:nth-child(#{1})") { |td|
td.inner_text.should
Hi guys. Which webrat gem should be used? There seem to be a few:
$ gem search -r webrat
*** REMOTE GEMS ***
aslakhellesoy-webrat (0.3.2.2)
benschwarz-webrat (0.3.2.1)
brynary-webrat (0.3.2.2)
flazz-webrat (0.3.2.1)
mfilej-webrat (0.2.1)
webrat (0.3.4)
Bart Zonneveld wrote:
Hey all,
I've read
http://rspec.lighthouseapp.com/projects/16211-cucumber/tickets/3-%20%20create-givenscenario-dependency-accross-feature-file,
and would like to share another idea about this.
I'm building a blog at the moment, in which users can report a comment
as sp
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 9:25 PM, Mischa Fierer wrote:
> While I agree that ie6 must die, the fix required to make it work sounds
> minimal in this case. I may be wrong.
>
> Perhaps, Aidy, you would be interested in submitting a patch which Aslak
> could then decide on?
>
I'm definitely intereste
Matt Wynne wrote:
>
> +1 to all that. I feel like you get lectured quite a bit by this list
> James, but you'd do well to heed the advice of some battle-hardened
> journeymen, IMO.
>
I thought that you might like to know that, after reflecting on this
overnight, I took this matter up in a desi
Hey all,
I've read http://rspec.lighthouseapp.com/projects/16211-cucumber/tickets/3-%20%20create-givenscenario-dependency-accross-feature-file
, and would like to share another idea about this.
I'm building a blog at the moment, in which users can report a comment
as spam. So, I have a featu
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 7:30 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 8:23 PM, Chris Kampmeier
> wrote:
>
> > (Or, here's a syntax-highlighted pastie: http://pastie.org/361114)
>
> Don't forget that the spec should come first :) Also, you're spec'ing
> behaviour, not implementation. S
While I agree that ie6 must die, the fix required to make it work sounds
minimal in this case. I may be wrong.
Perhaps, Aidy, you would be interested in submitting a patch which Aslak
could then decide on?
M
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 12:27 PM, Nick Hoffman wrote:
> On 2009-01-15, at 11:35, asla
On 2009-01-15, at 11:35, aslak hellesoy wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 5:18 PM, aidy lewis
wrote:
Hi,
The users are using IE6. The Cucumber HTML appears fine in firefox,
opera, IE7 etc.
However, I am not receiving any colouring in IE6.
I put the cucumber.css through the w3c validator and no
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 9:16 AM, Pat Maddox wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 4:07 AM, Tom Cloyd wrote:
>> Real beginner question here. I don't really know rake, so I'm stumbling.
>>
>> As I set a dir to hold my feature files, etc., I'm simply copying the files
>> structure I see in
>> /usr/lib/ru
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 5:18 PM, aidy lewis wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The users are using IE6. The Cucumber HTML appears fine in firefox,
> opera, IE7 etc.
>
> However, I am not receiving any colouring in IE6.
>
> I put the cucumber.css through the w3c validator and no errors.
>
> Is anyone else having the
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 4:16 PM, Pat Maddox wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 4:07 AM, Tom Cloyd wrote:
> > Real beginner question here. I don't really know rake, so I'm stumbling.
> >
> > As I set a dir to hold my feature files, etc., I'm simply copying the
> files
> > structure I see in
> > /us
On Jan 15, 2009, at 7:24 AM, Mike Gaffney wrote:
s.ross's email about Screw.Unit brought prompted me to ask this
question:
1) What do you use for Javascript Unit testing?
I've tried jsspec and Screw.Unit and so far I'm thinking Screw.Unit is
better suited to what I'm doing. It has nested
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 4:07 AM, Tom Cloyd wrote:
> Real beginner question here. I don't really know rake, so I'm stumbling.
>
> As I set a dir to hold my feature files, etc., I'm simply copying the files
> structure I see in
> /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/cucumber-0.1.13/examples/i18n/en/
>
> I kn
Hi,
The users are using IE6. The Cucumber HTML appears fine in firefox,
opera, IE7 etc.
However, I am not receiving any colouring in IE6.
I put the cucumber.css through the w3c validator and no errors.
Is anyone else having the same problem?
Aidy
___
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 6:39 PM, s.ross wrote:
> I've been using Screw.Unit for some js testing and like the similarity to
> rSpec, but information is pretty scarce on the Web. What I'm trying to sort
> out is how to spec a jQuery click handler that submits a form (basically
> emulates Rails' link
s.ross's email about Screw.Unit brought prompted me to ask this question:
1) What do you use for Javascript Unit testing?
2) How do you integrate it with a continuous build such as CCRB? (I'm
guessing selenium).
-Mike
___
rspec-users mailing list
rsp
Matt Wynne escribió:
> Use this syntax:
>
> cucumber path/to/your.feature:41
Thanks Matt!
"I should read usage info from top to bottom before asking in the list"
"I should read usage info from top to bottom before asking in the list"
"I should read usage info from top to bottom before asking in th
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 2:58 AM, Matt Wynne wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> We have a "features" environment for Rails, where we run the Cucumber stuff.
> This lets us run specs and features in different databases, which can be
> handy.
>
> I think I've found that rspec-rails 1.1.12 is doing something nast
aslak hellesoy escribió:
>
> foo.feature:line is even faster - you can copy-paste it
In two words: awe-some :)
Thanks again!
>
> http://wiki.github.com/aslakhellesoy/cucumber/running-features
I should read the wiki before asking at the list
I should read the wiki before asking at the list
I shoul
Real beginner question here. I don't really know rake, so I'm stumbling.
As I set a dir to hold my feature files, etc., I'm simply copying the
files structure I see in
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/cucumber-0.1.13/examples/i18n/en/
I know we need a Rake file ME little dir tree, but I don't thin
> ¿Where is the method raw defined?
Sorry this is stupid.
Forget my last question
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
I am having some trouble using step tables.
I am trying with an step similar to the sample step generarated by the
cucumber generator
Then /^I should see the following froobles:$/ do |froobles|
froobles.raw[1..-1].each_with_index do |row, i|
row.each_with_index do |cell, j|
response.s
Hi folks,
We have a "features" environment for Rails, where we run the Cucumber
stuff. This lets us run specs and features in different databases,
which can be handy.
I think I've found that rspec-rails 1.1.12 is doing something nasty to
the RAILS_ENV constant to force it to == "test"
L
27 matches
Mail list logo
