On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 10:36 PM, Phlip wrote:
> Pat Maddox wrote:
>
>> I'll blame Merb on the basis that there is no "inherit" in RSpec. I'm
>> guessing it's some kind of merb extension.
>
> http://blog.davidchelimsky.net/2007/4/1/rspec-plays-nice-with-others
>
> I know I know - time flies!
>
> I
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 8:36 PM, Phlip wrote:
> Pat Maddox wrote:
>
>> I'll blame Merb on the basis that there is no "inherit" in RSpec. I'm
>> guessing it's some kind of merb extension.
>
> http://blog.davidchelimsky.net/2007/4/1/rspec-plays-nice-with-others
>
> I know I know - time flies!
>
> If
Pat Maddox wrote:
I'll blame Merb on the basis that there is no "inherit" in RSpec. I'm
guessing it's some kind of merb extension.
http://blog.davidchelimsky.net/2007/4/1/rspec-plays-nice-with-others
I know I know - time flies!
If it has been superseded, then how do you inject a batch of as
I'll blame Merb on the basis that there is no "inherit" in RSpec. I'm
guessing it's some kind of merb extension.
Pat
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 6:19 PM, Phlip wrote:
> I have to bump this one because it looks like it's on RSpec's core feature
> list, and I reeally need a fix for it.
>
> Feel free
I have to bump this one because it looks like it's on RSpec's core feature list,
and I reeally need a fix for it.
Feel free to blame Merb, if they munged the inherit() method somehow!
Here's the relevant bits that don't work. (I changed the goal library to
the 'assert2' patched into Test::Unit
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 3:30 PM, Ben Greenberg
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This spec always passes:
>
>lambda do
> process_card @credit_card, billing_info, 10604, '1.1.1.1', @gateway
>end.should raise_error(MinimalCart::CaptureFailureError) do |ex|
> ex.should be_nil
> ex.should_not
On Feb 2, 2009, at 6:30 PM, Ben Greenberg wrote:
Hi all,
This spec always passes:
lambda do
process_card @credit_card, billing_info, 10604, '1.1.1.1',
@gateway
end.should raise_error(MinimalCart::CaptureFailureError) do |ex|
ex.should be_nil
ex.should_not be_nil
e
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 4:22 PM, Pat Maddox wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 3:30 PM, Ben Greenberg
> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> This spec always passes:
>>
>>lambda do
>> process_card @credit_card, billing_info, 10604, '1.1.1.1', @gateway
>>end.should raise_error(MinimalCart::CaptureFail
On Feb 2, 2009, at 6:30 PM, Ben Greenberg wrote:
Hi all,
This spec always passes:
lambda do
process_card @credit_card, billing_info, 10604, '1.1.1.1',
@gateway
end.should raise_error(MinimalCart::CaptureFailureError) do |ex|
ex.should be_nil
ex.should_not be_nil
e
Hi all,
This spec always passes:
lambda do
process_card @credit_card, billing_info, 10604, '1.1.1.1', @gateway
end.should raise_error(MinimalCart::CaptureFailureError) do |ex|
ex.should be_nil
ex.should_not be_nil
ex.responses.should be_nil
ex.responses.shou
r_j_h_box...@yahoo.com wrote:
A question for edumacational purposes here: Instead of disabling transactions,
would it be effective to include all the steps of inserting the record and
running the search, inside one scenario?
Given [the record is added to the database"
When [I search for it]
Th
Hi,
Running: Ruby 1.8.7 p72, RSpec 1.1.12 and rcov 0.8.1.2.0, I get the
following error message with $ rake spec:rcov
--
/usr/local/ruby1.8.7//lib/ruby/1.8/rexml/formatters/pretty.rb:131:in
`[]': no implicit conversion from nil to integer (TypeError)
from
/usr/local/ruby1.8.7//lib/ruby/1.
On 2 feb 2009, at 17:00, Ben Mabey wrote:
Bart Zonneveld wrote:
Hey list,
Anyone have experience with acts_as_xapian and Cucumber? I'm
struggling with updating xapian's index, to actually "find" fluff
that has been indexed..
In a scenario, I'm adding a bunch of articles, and in the actual
James Byrne wrote:
>
> I have one other difficulty when running this on MS-WinXPpro under
> cygwin. The newline character seems to have no effect. I can force it
> to behave locally by adding a \r in front of each \n but, obviously,
> that will have unfortunate consequences on *nix.
Actually
On 2 feb 2009, at 18:15, r_j_h_box...@yahoo.com wrote:
A question for edumacational purposes here: Instead of disabling
transactions, would it be effective to include all the steps of
inserting the record and running the search, inside one scenario?
That is exactly what I am doing in my
James Byrne wrote:
>
> What is happening is that RSpec is blowing up at its own logger code in
> the default spec_helper.rb file. This happens whether or not ActAsFu is
> installed and whether or not my custom logger is commented out in
> environment.rb
I poked at this a bit and hit upon the
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 7:00 PM, Tim Walker wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> I see in the Cucmber --help that -d akd --dry-run is supported but it
> doesn't seem to work.
>
> Anyone know why?
>
Because it has a bug that has been fixed in 0.2 prereleases (0.1.99.x)
http://tinyurl.com/cucumber-0-2-beta
Aslak
Hi Guys,
I see in the Cucmber --help that -d akd --dry-run is supported but it
doesn't seem to work.
Anyone know why?
Thanks, very much.
Tim
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
> I rspec models that use xss_terminate with no problem. I have not see
> the error you're getting.
>
> linoj
Thanks. Knowing that it is possible to spec models that use
xss_terminate I was able to figure out that in one of my attributes I
was passing a Time object, so simply converting it to
A question for edumacational purposes here: Instead of disabling transactions,
would it be effective to include all the steps of inserting the record and
running the search, inside one scenario?
Given [the record is added to the database"
When [I search for it]
Then [I should find it]
If this
On Feb 2, 2009, at 11:30 AM, Fernando Perez wrote:
Hi,
I have a Rails app that uses xss_terminate to sanitize the user input
before it gets saved to the DB. In my specs when I call
@product.should
be_valid or @product.save, I get the following error message:
--
NoMethodError in 'Creating a
Bart Zonneveld wrote:
Hey list,
Anyone have experience with acts_as_xapian and Cucumber? I'm
struggling with updating xapian's index, to actually "find" fluff that
has been indexed..
In a scenario, I'm adding a bunch of articles, and in the actual
search step, I run:
When "I search for \"$q
Hi,
I have a Rails app that uses xss_terminate to sanitize the user input
before it gets saved to the DB. In my specs when I call @product.should
be_valid or @product.save, I get the following error message:
--
NoMethodError in 'Creating a product with all necessary attributes
should be valid'
und
Great advice, I did all the suggestions you made, and... it is GOOD and
CLEAN:)
Thanks Aslak
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 1:58 PM, aslak hellesoy wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 2:24 PM, AndreXP
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi list,
> >
> > I might have not asked this correctly in previous post.. and most
> defi
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 2:24 PM, AndreXP wrote:
>
> Hi list,
>
> I might have not asked this correctly in previous post.. and most definitely
> weren't clear! let's try again :)
>
> I can't seem to find any examples of using a rake variable in the Cucumber
> task. What I want to do is run my cucumb
Hi list,
I might have not asked this correctly in previous post.. and most definitely
weren’t clear! let’s try again :)
I can’t seem to find any examples of using a rake variable in the Cucumber
task. What I want to do is run my cucumber test using cruisecontrol and
setting a variable in script
Hey list,
Anyone have experience with acts_as_xapian and Cucumber? I'm
struggling with updating xapian's index, to actually "find" fluff
that has been indexed..
In a scenario, I'm adding a bunch of articles, and in the actual
search step, I run:
When "I search for \"$query\"" do |query|
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 12:02 PM, wrote:
> Passing the it() and describe() args through to the reporting layer sounds
> like a great idea. I've thought more about the reporting-levels approach.
> The numeric as I postulated earlier is probably not the most useful thing.
>
> As a product manager,
On 2 Feb 2009, at 06:18, r_j_h_box...@yahoo.com wrote:
Okay, following up on this item. Would you believe a workaround of
(gasp) get :index, prior to expecting route-based URLs to work?
(slaps
That's what I was going to suggest. We have all our routing tests in a
separate file (away fr
29 matches
Mail list logo
