On 4 Feb 2009, at 17:55, John Kolokotronis wrote:
Why do you want before(:all)? Generally it's use is disregarded,
just
as global variables are considered harmful, not because they can't be
used well, but because 99% of the times they aren't.
Because I want to be able to create a single @b
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 11:08 PM, Christopher Bailey wrote:
>
> My primary residual concern is that the DB isn't clean after the specs run,
> which means it's not clean for the features/Cucumber run.
>
Fixtures?
///ark
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec
Just normal Webrat, no Selenium, it's not installed, etc.
I've now got things working, although I honestly have no idea what changed
that makes it consistently run now. I did update to rspec and rspec-rails
1.1.12, but it still failed for a while after that.
My primary residual concern is that th
Are you running selenium or normal webrat (eg config.mode = :rails or
config.mode = :selenium)?
Christopher Bailey wrote:
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 12:54 PM, aslak hellesoy
mailto:aslak.helle...@gmail.com>> wrote:
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 7:21 PM, Christopher Bailey
mailto:ch...@cobaltedg
I highly recommend this blog post by Jay Fields:
http://blog.jayfields.com/2009/02/thoughts-on-developer-testing.html
Cheers,
David
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 7:42 PM, Brad wrote:
> I have a controller spec that works find with Rails 2.2.2 and Rspec-
> Rails 1.1.11. The code is:
>
> @activity=mock_model(Activity, :id => 7)
> Activity.stub!(:get).with("7").and_return(@activity
>
> When I update to 1.1.12
>
> ArgumentError in 'Ac
I have a controller spec that works find with Rails 2.2.2 and Rspec-
Rails 1.1.11. The code is:
@activity=mock_model(Activity, :id => 7)
Activity.stub!(:get).with("7").and_return(@activity
When I update to 1.1.12
ArgumentError in 'ActivitiesController' wrong number of arguments (2
for 1)
F
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 12:54 PM, aslak hellesoy wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 7:21 PM, Christopher Bailey
> wrote:
> > I've been battling the strangest behavior, and hoping someone can shed
> some
> > light...
> > I am using RSpec for MVC tests, and then Cucumber for stories/features.
> I
> >
Hi all,
This spec always passes:
lambda do
process_card @credit_card, billing_info, 10604, '1.1.1.1', @gateway
end.should raise_error(MinimalCart::CaptureFailureError) do |ex|
ex.should be_nil
ex.should_not be_nil
ex.responses.should be_nil
ex.responses.shou
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 7:21 PM, Christopher Bailey wrote:
> I've been battling the strangest behavior, and hoping someone can shed some
> light...
> I am using RSpec for MVC tests, and then Cucumber for stories/features. I
> am new to Cucumber, and recently finished converting our RSpec Story Run
Hi--
On Feb 3, 2009, at 9:44 PM, MarkMT wrote:
Thanks David. Those specs are very instructive. I have no idea what I
was doing wrong before, but the behavior I'm seeing now is indeed
consistent with the specs and matches what I had understood from the
code I'd looked at (I suspect it'll stop wo
I am using auto_complete to provide a list of persons from which the
user can select one. On selection from the auto_complete list, a hidden
field is updated with the id of the selected person. This is all wrapped
in a form, that then can be submitted by the user (by clicking the
provided submit bu
I've been battling the strangest behavior, and hoping someone can shed some
light...
I am using RSpec for MVC tests, and then Cucumber for stories/features. I
am new to Cucumber, and recently finished converting our RSpec Story Runner
suite to it. What I'm seeing is that if I clean the database (
> Why do you want before(:all)? Generally it's use is disregarded, just
> as global variables are considered harmful, not because they can't be
> used well, but because 99% of the times they aren't.
Because I want to be able to create a single @browser object at the
beginning
of my tests and have
Thanks for the reply David - much appreciated. At least now I know
that it can't be done, rather
than pursuing it further for now. I'll just have to live without that
functionality for now and add
it later on if a fix is made available.
Regards,
John
On Feb 4, 2:03 pm, David Chelimsky wrote:
>
John Kolokotronis wrote:
Hi all,
I'm new to Rspec but loving it so far and looking to use it as a
replacement for a Test::Unit framework I have which drives a web app
via Watir. So far, things have worked very well with Rspec but I can't
get my head around how before/after(:all) blocks would wor
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 3:07 AM, John Kolokotronis wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm new to Rspec but loving it so far and looking to use it as a
> replacement for a Test::Unit framework I have which drives a web app
> via Watir. So far, things have worked very well with Rspec but I can't
> get my head arou
Hi all,
I'm new to Rspec but loving it so far and looking to use it as a
replacement for a Test::Unit framework I have which drives a web app
via Watir. So far, things have worked very well with Rspec but I can't
get my head around how before/after(:all) blocks would work in nested
groups, or even
18 matches
Mail list logo
