Phlip wrote:
Yury Kotlyarov wrote:
http://github.com/yura/howto-rspec-custom-matchers/
The project aims to encourage feedback on the best practices of
creating custom expectation matchers and specs for them.
Does it make sense?
That just says it's a "project".
One git clone later... It
I have a fix to SslRequirement that allows you to exclude user-
specified domain names. It's quite likely that you won't want to use
SSL on some machines when in development. In any case, I have a bear
of a time with the Rails Test::Unit setup so that part's missing, but
look over:
http://
Yury Kotlyarov wrote:
http://github.com/yura/howto-rspec-custom-matchers/
The project aims to encourage feedback on the best practices of creating
custom expectation matchers and specs for them.
Does it make sense?
That just says it's a "project".
One git clone later... It is a Rails 2.3
> You spec the public interface that calls (or causes to be called) the
> protected methods.
Ok I see. Thanks for the clarification.
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/m
Phlip wrote:
http://github.com/yura/howto-rspec-custom-matchers/
RSpec is a library ;-)
Please try again: What is that source code drop. A website? A library?
or something else?
ok - from README:
The project aims to encourage feedback on the best practices of creating
custom expectat
http://github.com/yura/howto-rspec-custom-matchers/
RSpec is a library ;-)
Please try again: What is that source code drop. A website? A library? or
something else?
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mail
Hello,
I've just installed cucumber 0.1.99, and it looks like the Portuguese
step keywords aren't recognized for some reason. I'm following this
example up on github:
http://github.com/aslakhellesoy/cucumber/blob/ae9bf75d586cda232310721f62ecab91fc2336c0/examples/i18n/pt/features/adicao.feature
W
Phlip wrote:
Yury Kotlyarov wrote:
The major problem is fixed:
http://github.com/yura/howto-rspec-custom-matchers/
Apologies if I missed something, but is that a howto or a library? Do
I git it and run it to ... learn to customize matchers?
RSpec is a library ;-) And I have some issues
Yury Kotlyarov wrote:
The major problem is fixed:
http://github.com/yura/howto-rspec-custom-matchers/
Apologies if I missed something, but is that a howto or a library? Do I git it
and run it to ... learn to customize matchers?
___
rspec-users mai
Phlip wrote:
David Chelimsky wrote:
This looks pretty cool. I wonder if you'd have any interest in making
this a bit more rspec-friendly? Something like an option to run it
like this:
expect_xpath do
It's on my do-list, but...
...are pluggable matchers as hard to write as the OP implied? Ho
Is your file path wrong? I see:
$:.unshift 'vendor/gems/cucumber-0.1.6/lib'
Shouldn't that be:
$:.unshift 'vendor/gems/cucumber-0.1.16/lib'
??
On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 7:41 AM, Bart Zonneveld wrote:
>
> On 13 feb 2009, at 16:28, David Chelimsky wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 6:23
Wincent Colaiuta wrote:
># always return false for tests
>return false if RAILS_ENV == 'test'
>
> I brand this as "hideous" because it commits the heinous crime of
> dynamically modifying application behaviour only when execution within
> the testing context is detected. Ugh.
>
> For the
On 13 feb 2009, at 16:28, David Chelimsky wrote:
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 6:23 AM, Bart Zonneveld > wrote:
On 13 feb 2009, at 12:14, David Chelimsky wrote:
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 4:47 AM, Bart Zonneveld >
wrote:
Hey list,
I have a test server, which doesn't have cucumber as gem, so I
un
13 matches
Mail list logo
