Re: [rspec-users] send_file testing

2009-02-22 Thread vo.x
Just to be clear, this is how the action looks: def download log = ActivityLog.find(params[:id]) if log send_file log.path else flash[:notice] = _("Log file \"#{params[:id]}\" was not found.") redirect_to :action => 'index' end end Vit ___

Re: [rspec-users] [cucumber] Cucumber and CI

2009-02-22 Thread aslak hellesoy
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 3:36 AM, Phlip wrote: > Yi Wen wrote: > >> I totally agree with you on this. I have a feeling a lot of people kind of >> use cucumber as a sexy way for doing waterfall. > > "Storytests" are very well represented in the Agile development community in > general. Cucumber is a

Re: [rspec-users] Culerity Error while running feature.

2009-02-22 Thread Kaleem Ullah
Let me try... Thanks for your reply. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. ___ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users

Re: [rspec-users] [cucumber] Cucumber and CI

2009-02-22 Thread Phlip
Yi Wen wrote: yeah, you guys are probably right on this. I was just over stating. :) Ah, but Waterfall is indeed like the Emissaries of the Shadow. If you defeat one of them, in one form, another one will always appear, take shape, and grow... I myself have heard well-meaning product manage

Re: [rspec-users] [cucumber] Cucumber and CI

2009-02-22 Thread Yi Wen
yeah, you guys are probably right on this. I was just over stating. :) Yi On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 8:36 PM, Phlip wrote: > Yi Wen wrote: > > I totally agree with you on this. I have a feeling a lot of people kind of >> use cucumber as a sexy way for doing waterfall. >> > > "Storytests" are very

Re: [rspec-users] [cucumber] Cucumber and CI

2009-02-22 Thread Phlip
Yi Wen wrote: I totally agree with you on this. I have a feeling a lot of people kind of use cucumber as a sexy way for doing waterfall. "Storytests" are very well represented in the Agile development community in general. Cucumber is a (slam-dunk) reinterpretation of Ward Cunningham's FIT c

Re: [rspec-users] [cucumber] Cucumber and CI

2009-02-22 Thread Yi Wen
Wait for an hour before I can checkin something is still too long for me. I'd like to checkin every couple minutes most of time. But I think to make each step just pending first and then make it green when I finish implementation for the step makes sense. I probably will still use unit tests passi

Re: [rspec-users] [cucumber] Cucumber and CI

2009-02-22 Thread David Chelimsky
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 6:14 PM, Yi Wen wrote: > I totally agree with you on this. I have a feeling a lot of people kind of > use cucumber as a sexy way for doing waterfall. That may be so, but one view of agile is that each iteration is a mini-waterfall. BDD suggests that we *should* define all

Re: [rspec-users] [cucumber] Cucumber and CI

2009-02-22 Thread Yi Wen
I totally agree with you on this. I have a feeling a lot of people kind of use cucumber as a sexy way for doing waterfall. On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 5:18 PM, Mark Wilden wrote: > On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 1:36 PM, aslak hellesoy > wrote: > > You don't have to write all > > scenarios when you start

Re: [rspec-users] [cucumber] Cucumber and CI

2009-02-22 Thread Mark Wilden
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 1:36 PM, aslak hellesoy wrote: > You don't have to write all > scenarios when you start working on a feature. I recommend you never > have more than one yellow scenario at a time. Whereas I use scenarios as a "to-do" list. I'll keep adding them as I think of them or as the

Re: [rspec-users] [cucumber] Cucumber and CI

2009-02-22 Thread aslak hellesoy
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 8:47 PM, Yi Wen wrote: > The rhythm for wrking with cucumber advertised by http://cukes.info/ is to > write tests that fails first, then code that fixes it. Now my question is, > what is the implication when combine this with Continuous Integration? > * Nobody checks in co

Re: [rspec-users] [cucumber] Cucumber and CI

2009-02-22 Thread Mark Wilden
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 11:47 AM, Yi Wen wrote: > Cucumber, as far as my understanding goes, works on feature level. It could > take people days to finish a cucumber feature. In the meantime, the cucumber > test remains broken. What do we do then? We cannot check in any code because > that'll bre

Re: [rspec-users] [Cucumber] host!

2009-02-22 Thread aslak hellesoy
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 9:19 PM, Mark Wilden wrote: > On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 2:03 AM, Aslak Hellesøy > wrote: >> Den 22. feb.. 2009 kl. 02.29 skrev Mark Wilden : >> >>> I'm trying to set a specific host that all my Cucumber steps should >>> use. Putting 'host! "beta.rupture.local"' in Before in

Re: [rspec-users] [cucumber] Cucumber and CI

2009-02-22 Thread Zach Dennis
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 2:47 PM, Yi Wen wrote: > The rhythm for wrking with cucumber advertised by http://cukes.info/ is to > write tests that fails first, then code that fixes it. Now my question is, > what is the implication when combine this with Continuous Integration? > > We all know when we

[rspec-users] send_file testing

2009-02-22 Thread vo.x
Hello all, Is there some best practice how to test Rails controller action which is using send_file method? Could you help me please? Vit ___ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users

Re: [rspec-users] [Cucumber] host!

2009-02-22 Thread Mark Wilden
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 2:03 AM, Aslak Hellesøy wrote: > Den 22. feb.. 2009 kl. 02.29 skrev Mark Wilden : > >> I'm trying to set a specific host that all my Cucumber steps should >> use. Putting 'host! "beta.rupture.local"' in Before in env.rb doesn't >> produce any errors, but it doesn't seem to

[rspec-users] [cucumber] Cucumber and CI

2009-02-22 Thread Yi Wen
The rhythm for wrking with cucumber advertised by http://cukes.info/ is to write tests that fails first, then code that fixes it. Now my question is, what is the implication when combine this with Continuous Integration? We all know when we do TDD/BDD in unit level, one test can be fixed fairly qu

Re: [rspec-users] Culerity Error while running feature.

2009-02-22 Thread Joaquin Rivera Padron
cool, I'll give that a try in short thanks joaquin 2009/2/22, aslak hellesoy : > On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Joaquin Rivera Padron > wrote: >> hey Kaleem, >> I am myself no expert on w$ but the line throwing the error is >> def self.run_server >> IO.popen("jruby #{__FILE__}", 'r+') >

Re: [rspec-users] [RSpec][OT] have autospec just run changed files

2009-02-22 Thread David Chelimsky
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 12:33 AM, Ben Mabey wrote: > Stephen Eley wrote: >> >> On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 2:33 PM, Peter Jaros >> wrote: >> >>> >>> Other than that, I can't think of a way to do it short of writing your >>> own autospec style and overriding the #run algorithm. >>> >> >> Which is almo

Re: [rspec-users] Culerity Error while running feature.

2009-02-22 Thread aslak hellesoy
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Joaquin Rivera Padron wrote: > hey Kaleem, > I am myself no expert on w$ but the line throwing the error is > def self.run_server > IO.popen("jruby #{__FILE__}", 'r+') When forking a new ruby interpreter, always use rbconfig: require 'rbconfig' ruby = File.

Re: [rspec-users] [ANN] rspec-1.2 release candidate

2009-02-22 Thread David Chelimsky
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 4:35 AM, Juanma Cervera wrote: > David, > > I have an error when trying to run autospec. > It works when I run 'rake spec' > > I don know why it is still using the rspec-1.1.12 gem. > > > /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/dchelimsky-rspec-1.1.99.7/lib/spec/autorun.rb:3: > undefin

[rspec-users] Cucumber now runs Webrat and Celerity together

2009-02-22 Thread Joaquin Rivera Padron
hey there, I have Cucumber running Webrat and Celerity (using culerity) together, check it out in the sample project: http://github.com/joahking/cukes/tree/masters It's a first try, but it runs. I get them by following a feature directory structure similar to the suggested in http://wiki.github.co

Re: [rspec-users] [Cucumber, Webrat] Error backtraces shown as HTML in co

2009-02-22 Thread Jacob Radford
> Rails' HTML error page. It comes up both in my browser (presumably > save_and_open_page doing its thing) and the same HTML is dumped to the > console. > > Can anyone else confirm that with latest Cucumber and Webrat they > *don't* get this behaviour? I do see this behavior and it is specifical

Re: [rspec-users] Culerity Error while running feature.

2009-02-22 Thread Joaquin Rivera Padron
hey Kaleem, I am myself no expert on w$ but the line throwing the error is def self.run_server IO.popen("jruby #{__FILE__}", 'r+') end are you able to run popen calls in w$ ? try your irb and see, if not maybe there's some w$ expert who can help hope that helps joaquin

[rspec-users] Culerity Error while running feature.

2009-02-22 Thread Kaleem Ullah
Hi All, I need your guide on an issue. My Environment: Window xp , Rails 2.2.2, Rspec-rails 1.1.11, Rspec 1.1.11, Cucmber , Webrat,Culerity I installed the jruby, sets its path in environment. It shows me Version of jruby also. Now the problem is when before installing langalex-culerity(http:

Re: [rspec-users] [Cucumber] host!

2009-02-22 Thread Aslak Hellesøy
Den 22. feb.. 2009 kl. 02.29 skrev Mark Wilden : I'm trying to set a specific host that all my Cucumber steps should use. Putting 'host! "beta.rupture.local"' in Before in env.rb doesn't produce any errors, but it doesn't seem to be making the next request use that host, either. If I explicit