On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 4:07 AM, Matt Wynne wrote:
>
> On 27 May 2009, at 03:38, Julian Leviston wrote:
>
>> On 27/05/2009, at 9:33 AM, Gary Lin wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I wonder if there is any way to tell the test script to continue even
>>> when encountering an assertion failure? The reason I
On 29 May 2009, at 13:51, Tom Stuart wrote:
Hi David,
On 29 May 2009, at 12:10, David Chelimsky wrote:
Have you read "Mock Roles, not Objects"?
"its corresponding mock" suggests a single mock object for each real
implementation. There's nothing stopping you from writing your own
mock objects