On Aug 20, 3:02 pm, Mike Sassak wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 3:00 PM, Ed Ruder wrote:
> > All,
>
> > In a Rails helper spec, how do I stub or mock the 'link_to' method?
> > When i step into link_to, self.class is
>
> > Spec::Rails::Example::HelperExampleGroup::Subclass_1::Subclass_5::Subclass
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 4:44 PM, Rick DeNatale wrote:
>
> Actually, the way I read it was that management was already on board
> with git and approved converting over to it which they have, but it's
> the cow orkers and their lack of training which is "preventing" them
> from actually benefitting f
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 1:17 PM, Stephen Eley wrote:
> Question for you: is "management" committing code?
>
> If not, why should you need to convince them of anything? Don't ask
> permission. Branching doesn't need any extra budget. Just start
> doing it. Follow good practices, and let your tea
When running autotest only 'rake spec' is running
and I want it to run 'rake spec:remote' as well.
How do i achieve that?
thanks
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
Spot on, Tom. Thanks.
For the (google) record:
Time.usec Returns just the number of microseconds for the given time.
ActiveRecord datetime attributes ignore microseconds (at least with
the SQLite adapter). In my case:
now.usec: 991786
@verif
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Marcelo de Moraes
Serpa wrote:
>
> I'm using git, actually I love git. However, we started with svn
> unfortunately and only now the management saw the benefits of git and
> we migrated. However, 99% of the developers of this project does not
> know how to use git,
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Marcelo de Moraes
Serpa wrote:
> we started with svn
> unfortunately and only now the management saw the benefits of git and
> we migrated. However, 99% of the developers of this project does not
> know how to use git, and with this I mean they don't know what
> br
On 21 Aug 2009, at 17:15, George Anderson wrote:
expected: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 16:08:51 UTC +00:00,
got: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 16:08:51 UTC +00:00 (using ==)
They're identical, no?
Not necessarily -- Time instances are microsecond precision, so two of
them can differ (in microseconds) but hav
I'm having an issue comparing two seemingly equivalent dates:
spec:
it "sets the user's session_key_updated_at" do
now = Time.zone.now
Timecop.freeze(now) do
verify_user
@verified_user.session_key_updated_at.should == now
end
end
output:
sets the user's session_key_updated_at
expect
Thanks guys,
Well, I think that one of the approaches would be to setup the
integration server to run only "the features that should pass", and
ignore the other ones (using tagging).
@Stephen: Sorry, I used the wrong term. I did not mean partial commit
in the technical term, but a "partial featur
10 matches
Mail list logo
