oren wrote:
When running autotest only 'rake spec' is running
and I want it to run 'rake spec:remote' as well.
How do i achieve that?
IIRC, autospec (not autotest) does not use rake at all. It uses the
opts defined in spec/spec.opts. I would suggest making any needed
changes in that fi
any clues?
On Aug 21, 1:13 pm, oren wrote:
> When running autotest only 'rake spec' is running
> and I want it to run 'rake spec:remote' as well.
>
> How do i achieve that?
>
> thanks
> ___
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-us...@rubyforge.orghttp://ru
Hello,
I'm struggling with this controller spec for a few hours now
http://pastie.org/594775
which is failing with an error I can't find any references about,
neither on the list nor on the web in general:
Admin::ImagesController handling PUT /images/1 with successful update
should find the ima
hey scott,
thanks for your answer, but I still don't seem to get the 'contextual' part
of the validations
I am missing something? (it's maybe thay I should get some sleep)
cheers,
joaquin
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://ruby
On Aug 25, 2009, at 6:39 PM, Joaquin Rivera Padron wrote:
hey there,
I have a question that may be raised from some misunderstanding of
my current problem. But the answer might well serve me for other
things.
The issue is I would like to be able to metaprogramatically (this
may be a bad
hey there,
I have a question that may be raised from some misunderstanding of my
current problem. But the answer might well serve me for other things.
The issue is I would like to be able to metaprogramatically (this may be a
bad chosen word) generate spec examples to check a model is valid again
On 25 Aug 2009, at 20:59, Chuck Remes wrote:
The documentation says the expectation passes or fails based upon
the return value of the block. I can't even force it to fail by
returning false.
The docs (http://rspec.info/documentation/mocks/message_expectations.html
) say:
You can supply a
Chuck Remes wrote:
I am trying to process a message sent to a mock to verify it contains
the correct keys. In my case I am sending a JSON string to the mock
built from data passed in via the test. The object internally builds a
hash and then constructs the JSON string from it.
I can't get my
I am trying to process a message sent to a mock to verify it contains
the correct keys. In my case I am sending a JSON string to the mock
built from data passed in via the test. The object internally builds a
hash and then constructs the JSON string from it.
I can't get my mock to fail thou
Yep. That's why most people who are uncomfortable with mocks are
uncomfortable with mocks.
In my experience mocks work best at well-defined, relatively stable
interfaces to external(ish) services. Otherwise you're testing the
implementation, which makes refactoring difficult. But there are lots
of
Tom -- perfect. That's exactly the kind of explanation I was looking
for, and now I can go and deal with these changes with a worry-free mind.
I find it too easy to forget that a class's public methods are, in fact,
an API (particularly when there are no libraries involved) and need to
be tes
On 25 Aug 2009, at 18:12, Denis Haskin wrote:
The key expectation in this example is:
@discount.should_not be_available(@order)
But I changed the implementation of Discount#available? so that it
calls Order#num_products instead of Order#line_items. My examples
now fail.
Why am I havin
This isn't really an rspec question, but about mocks and stubs in
general, and maybe I'm looking for some best practices with rspec.
I like mocks and stubs until code starts to change, and then I always
get frustrated because examples then seem so brittle and sensitive to
implementation detail
Ahh, got it! Thanks alot guys.
On Aug 25, 2:09 am, Christoph Schiessl wrote:
> On Aug 25, 2009, at 1:09 AM, jg wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > I have a very fairly simple spec
>
> > it "should assign an instance variable" do
> > get 'new'
> > assigns[:city].should == City.new
> > end
>
> > In my control
On Aug 25, 2009, at 1:09 AM, jg wrote:
I have a very fairly simple spec
it "should assign an instance variable" do
get 'new'
assigns[:city].should == City.new
end
In my controller
def new
@city = City.new
end
but when I run it, I get
'CitiesController GET 'new' should assign an instanc
15 matches
Mail list logo
