On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 8:58 PM, David Whetstone wrote:
>
> I'm not married to this particular implementation, the result of a series of
> compromises made while trying to add this ability with few changes to RSpec.
> Being able to produce the output above is really what I'm after. In
> addition
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 10:05 AM, Brian Cardarella
wrote:
> If I'm writing a matcher is there anyway to access the scope of the
> example from within the matcher? (something that already exists in
> rspec, not passing a new binding to the matcher)
There is nothing implicit as of yet. You _can_ wr
If I'm writing a matcher is there anyway to access the scope of the
example from within the matcher? (something that already exists in
rspec, not passing a new binding to the matcher)
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge
