Steve,
> Giuseppe: have you tried running 'rake routes' to see what the
> application thinks you valid routes are? Reconciling that with what's
> going on in routes.rb is a good next step.
The following line is the whole of the 'rake routes' output:
accept_invitation /accept_invitation/:id
{:a
On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 9:44 AM, giuseb wrote:
>> > So sorry, I must be missing something.
>> > I am looking right now at this page:
>>
>> >http://www.ruby-forum.com/topic/195172
>>
>> Well - that _should_ be one of two correct URLs. The forum is mirrored
>> w/ a google group. I see there are post
On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 11:49 AM, giuseb wrote:
>> The bad news is that this is a deficiency the underlying Rails testing
>> framework that rspec-rails wraps. I tried the same example in a rails
>> functional test and got the same failure:
>>
>> class InvitationsControllerTest < ActionController::
> The bad news is that this is a deficiency the underlying Rails testing
> framework that rspec-rails wraps. I tried the same example in a rails
> functional test and got the same failure:
>
> class InvitationsControllerTest < ActionController::TestCase
>
> test "the post accept invitation should
> > So sorry, I must be missing something.
> > I am looking right now at this page:
>
> >http://www.ruby-forum.com/topic/195172
>
> Well - that _should_ be one of two correct URLs. The forum is mirrored
> w/ a google group. I see there are posts missing from the forum, but I
> see all the posts in
On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 10:28 AM, David Chelimsky wrote:
>
> We don't offer much help, as Matt doesn't see a problem and I can't
> reproduce it - but at least we tried to play :)
I'll take a turn! Helps me procrastinate on my own stuff. >8->
Giuseppe: have you tried running 'rake routes' to se
On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 8:10 AM, Giuseppe Bertini wrote:
>> Huh? Pretty please what? Matt and I have both responded. In my case I
>> asked you about the versions you have. You didn't quote any of the
>> previous posts in this thread, so I have no idea what you're asking
>> for at this point. Did y
> Huh? Pretty please what? Matt and I have both responded. In my case I
> asked you about the versions you have. You didn't quote any of the
> previous posts in this thread, so I have no idea what you're asking
> for at this point. Did you receive our responses?
So sorry, I must be missing somethi
On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 1:56 AM, Giuseppe Bertini wrote:
> Pretty please? :)
Huh? Pretty please what? Matt and I have both responded. In my case I
asked you about the versions you have. You didn't quote any of the
previous posts in this thread, so I have no idea what you're asking
for at this poi
Pretty please? :)
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
Hi,
I got the same error while writing an extension for Spree and found this
thread through Google. It seems it's caused by the jeremymcanally-stump[1]
gem used by the application. You should use the syntax shown in the
documentation
http://github.com/jeremymcanally/stump
Regards
On Wed, Aug 26,
11 matches
Mail list logo
