On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 9:31 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
>
> As for internals, my goal for the Cucumber features is to provide an
> executable set of documentation for end users to understand how to use
> RSpec. Not so much to expose internals, which I think is better addressed in
> the RSpec code e
On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Ryan Briones
wrote:
> This sounds pretty cool. Are there any ideas or examples of how features
> would get turned into end user documentation? My first thought is something
> RDoc like would go in the free-form user story area... I'd certainly like to
> help as time
On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 8:44 PM, jko170 wrote:
> In my spec folder, I have a "remote" directory, which contains my
> specs for live data transferring with an outside api. When I run rake
> spec, it runs the remote specs and I don't want it to. Keep in mind
> there is NO lib/tasks/remote.task file.
On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 6:18 PM, Carlos Rodriguez wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm having a problem with RSpec when using the "lambda should change
> behavior".
>
> This is happening in a Rails 2.3.4 app and I'm running the following
> in my test environment:
>
> 'cucumber', :version => '0.4.2'
> 'faker',
2009/11/5 Chuck van der Linden
> On Nov 4, 5:30 pm, David Chelimsky wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 3:36 PM, Stephen Eley wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 3:24 PM, Andrew Premdas
> wrote:
> >
> > > > Personally I now think nested steps are evil - but thats another
> story :)
> >
> > > It
Hello,
I'm having a problem with RSpec when using the "lambda should change behavior".
This is happening in a Rails 2.3.4 app and I'm running the following
in my test environment:
'cucumber', :version => '0.4.2'
'faker', :version => '0.3.1'
'notahat-machinist', :lib => 'machinist', :version => '
This sounds pretty cool. Are there any ideas or examples of how features
would get turned into end user documentation? My first thought is something
RDoc like would go in the free-form user story area... I'd certainly like to
help as time permitted. I'd definitely like to be more informed of rspec
In my spec folder, I have a "remote" directory, which contains my
specs for live data transferring with an outside api. When I run rake
spec, it runs the remote specs and I don't want it to. Keep in mind
there is NO lib/tasks/remote.task file. I ONLY want these remote specs
to run when I execute ra
David Chelimsky escreveu:
Hi all,
describe "RSpec's documentation" do
it "should be helpful"
it "should be maintainable"
end
I've been wanting to improve RSpec's documentation situation for a
long time, but my writing energies have been consumed by rspec itself
and The RSpec Book for a lo
