On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 9:25 PM, John Smith wrote:
> Hello, I have a very simple non-web application I am trying to test
> against. Say I have a library folder with several .rb files, and the one
> that is to be executed is main.rb ('ruby main.rb' via command line).
> How would I set up cucumber
Hello, I have a very simple non-web application I am trying to test
against. Say I have a library folder with several .rb files, and the one
that is to be executed is main.rb ('ruby main.rb' via command line).
How would I set up cucumber to run the above script and test against the
output generated
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 9:53 AM, Ed Howland wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 10:09 AM, David Chelimsky
> wrote:> That said, I definitely think we need a home for information about
> matchers.
> > Hosting them, however, is something I'd rather leave to the professionals
> :)
> > I've imagined a w
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 10:09 AM, David Chelimsky wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 4:28 AM, Ashley Moran
> wrote:
>>
>> On 28 Dec 2009, at 16:27, David Chelimsky wrote:
>>
> First, I have no cycles to start setting something up like this for a while
> now. I'm trying to wrap up the loose ends on
On Dec 28, 2:33 pm, David Chelimsky wrote:
> So we're going to leave it as raise_error for now. If you'd like to push on
> this (which you're welcome to), please add a ticket to lighthouse so it's
> easy to find the discussions around it. If we can get general consensus that
> this would be a good
> So we're going to leave it as raise_error for now. If you'd like to push on
> this (which you're welcome to), please add a ticket to lighthouse so it's
> easy to find the discussions around it. If we can get general consensus that
> this would be a good move in spite of the negatives I just outli
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 4:28 AM, Ashley Moran wrote:
>
> On 28 Dec 2009, at 16:27, David Chelimsky wrote:
>
> > For most users, gems are the easiest answer. By all means, host source on
> github if you want people to contribute, or have a place to inspect code,
> but you don't need a public sourc
On 28 Dec 2009, at 16:27, David Chelimsky wrote:
> For most users, gems are the easiest answer. By all means, host source on
> github if you want people to contribute, or have a place to inspect code, but
> you don't need a public source repository in order to push gems to gemcutter.
A standar
