On Jul 14, 2010, at 7:44 PM, rogerdpack wrote:
> Would it be possible to have pending be accessible everywhere?
>
> Curgem rently with
>
> describe '' do
> pending 'abc' do
> end
> end
In rspec-2, you can do this:
describe "something", :pending => true do
...
end
And all the examples in tha
Would it be possible to have pending be accessible everywhere?
Curgem rently with
describe '' do
pending 'abc' do
end
end
yields:
C:\dev\ruby\universal-scene-skipper\spec>spec small.spec
C:/dev/ruby/universal-scene-skipper/spec/small.spec:3: undefined
method `pending' for Spec::Example::Examp
On 14 Jul 2010, at 15:26, Chuck Remes wrote:
> I find myself using this pattern quite a bit.
>
> rspec 1.30
> ruby 1.9.1, 1.9.2-rc2, jruby 1.51 all on osx 10.6.4
>
> class Foo
> def initialize
>@bar = Bar.new
> end
> end
>
> context "init" do
> it "should allocate a helper class Bar" do
When two strings fail to match, if the difference is somewhere in the
middle of the strings, it can be annoying/impossible to track down the
actual difference. I've written a little Comparison object that
provides this kind of error message:
Strings differ at position 12:
expected: ..."efghijklmno
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Chuck Remes wrote:
> I find myself using this pattern quite a bit.
>
> rspec 1.30
> ruby 1.9.1, 1.9.2-rc2, jruby 1.51 all on osx 10.6.4
>
> class Foo
> def initialize
> �...@bar = Bar.new
> end
> end
>
> context "init" do
> it "should allocate a helper class
I have figure this out.
I wanted to share this in case someone is having the same problem.
I have taken a different route to test email body:
Here is how my example looks now:
it "should contain child's first name and last name in email body" do
for part in @email.parts
if part["Conte
I find myself using this pattern quite a bit.
rspec 1.30
ruby 1.9.1, 1.9.2-rc2, jruby 1.51 all on osx 10.6.4
class Foo
def initialize
@bar = Bar.new
end
end
context "init" do
it "should allocate a helper class Bar" do
Bar.should_receive(:new)
Foo.new
end
end
That all works w
On Jul 13, 2010, at 8:49 PM, Arco wrote:
> In a recent blog post, David wrote:
>
> Because RSpec is the test framework of record, Rails doesn’t know to
> hide the test_unit generators. If you want to hide them, just add this
> to one of your config files:
>
>Rails::Generators.hide_namespace(
Anyone, who can help?
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
