On 14 Aug 2010, at 18:49, Don French wrote:
> Thought that was what you meant, but did not want to leave anything
> untried. I have updated to 1.9.2-rc2. same problem. I am going to
> have to do an update to snow leopard soon, may try it and put new code
> on not just restore.
I wish I could he
Thought that was what you meant, but did not want to leave anything
untried. I have updated to 1.9.2-rc2. same problem. I am going to
have to do an update to snow leopard soon, may try it and put new code
on not just restore.
Don French
On Aug 14, 4:40 am, Ashley Moran
wrote:
> On 13 Aug 2010,
Just released 0.5.0, a pretty stable release with a large rspec test
suite to show it off and ensure it works as it should :)
On Aug 11, 6:02 pm, Kristian Mandrup
wrote:
> Now with an almost complete test suite to ensure it all works as it
> should and to demonstrate how to use it.
> The DSL is b
On 14 Aug 2010, at 15:50, David Chelimsky wrote:
> I need to blog this, which I'll do later, but here is the short version:
You could pretty much copy and paste that "short version" into a chapter of the
RSpec Book, never mind a blog post ;)
--
http://www.patchspace.co.uk/
http://www.linkedin
Nin wrote:
> Hi! I'm new to rspec and was wondering how named_scopes are usually
> tested? Is it enough to test that it's defined? or do you need to test
> the behavior as well? I've been reading around and this seems to be
> the tester's choice, i just want to get people's opinion on this :D
Here
On 13 Aug 2010, at 22:16, Don French wrote:
> Not sure what you meant by "did you turn it off and on again?"
Ah, I just meant I was running out of ideas[1].
> The other information is here:
> http://pastie.org/1091155
All I can suggest is maybe updating RVM and trying in Ruby 1.9.2 with a fre
On Aug 14, 2010, at 9:26 AM, Ashley Moran wrote:
>
> On 14 Aug 2010, at 11:34, Mike Howson wrote:
>
>> Just wondered what people thoughts are to testing module's to be
>> included in mixin's? Seems to me there are two main approaches:-
>
> Hi Mike
>
> I've been doing a lot of this sort of cod
On Aug 14, 2010, at 5:34 AM, Mike Howson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just wondered what people thoughts are to testing module's to be
> included in mixin's? Seems to me there are two main approaches:-
>
> 1. Test the behavior in a mixin object that includes the module because
> its the behavior of the obje
On 14 Aug 2010, at 11:34, Mike Howson wrote:
> Just wondered what people thoughts are to testing module's to be
> included in mixin's? Seems to me there are two main approaches:-
Hi Mike
I've been doing a lot of this sort of coding lately, as I've been extracting
duplicated code into a mini-fr
Hi,
Just wondered what people thoughts are to testing module's to be
included in mixin's? Seems to me there are two main approaches:-
1. Test the behavior in a mixin object that includes the module because
its the behavior of the object thats important not the code structure.
2. Test the module
10 matches
Mail list logo
